who made up the terms microevolution and macroevolution?

Question

you do realize it's all just evolution, don't you? the idea of macroevolution is like seeing a person at one end of town in the morning and later finding him at the other end of town 10 miles away. when asked how he got there, he replies, "i jumped." obviously, no sane person would believe this, not even if he said he prayed to god that he could jump that far. most likely he walked the 10 miles. walked, being the key word. taking short steps, i.e. microevolution as some would say, over a long enough period will yield a big change.

Answer 1

Followers of Intelligent Design latched onto the terminology to try to explain away evolution and people have "aped" the terminologies ever since.

@>}-----}-----

AD

Answer 2

organic selection is the technique wherein a chain of differences already interior of a inhabitants gets winnowed right down to the few that are terrific proper to any particular environment. this is not any longer a rely of including something new to the genetic fabric of the inhabitants, yet purely removing what isn't working besides as another differences. case in point, a inhabitants of bears which wandered north quicker or later steadily misplaced contributors with much less fat, much less aggressiveness, and darker fur, finally leaving us with the white, aggressive, and fat-layered polar bears. There would have been some mutations or combinations which bigger the fat or the aggressiveness or the lightness of color, yet no longer something which replaced the fundamental "endure-ness" of the beast. this is a great deal distinctive from the form of evolution which posits that some form of unicellular organism, by means of thousands and thousands of mutations, became that endure interior the 1st place. the nice and comfortable button is that organic selection, by ability of itself, is powerless to create. this is a technique of 'culling', of choosing between a number of issues which ought to first be in existence. there is not any established organic regulation during which rely components upward thrust to suggestions, neither is any actual technique or fabric phenomenon established which could try this.

Answer 3

As much as you like to blame the definitions of: "macro" and "microevolution" on the creationists, the fact is that biologists came up with that.

Of course, it is an arbitrary definition, and it is clear that micro and macro evolution are distinct things still you will find this diferentiation it in some cientific books (i saw it in a high school science book once).

Paz de Cristo

Answer 4

Someone who doesn't even know what evolution is. Well said. I say it's probably the same people who think an argument against evolution is noting it's theory status, again not realizing how science works. Some people are just so brainwashed it is scary.,

To oyvery-speciation? You do realize that we draw a thin line when classifying different familys and phylums of species, give micro evolution time to happen and that line is easily crossed.

Answer 5

Yuri Filipchenko.

Creationists took the terms and continually altered the meaning to fit their agenda. The current Creationist definition of macroevolution is "more evolution than has been directly observed", thus it cannot be demonstrated.

Answer 6

I don't know have you tried Darwin? Both these terms are in my child's science book so I know it was not a creationist.

I notice a lot of people on this site keep saying it was invented by "creationist". Since these terms are in my children's textbooks this cannot be right. Because according to most school districts "creationism" is not allowed to be taught in the public schools.

Answer 7

Creationists must have come up with it to discredit evolution. Since the idea of creation is so ridiculous, and they know it, they want to make evolution sound ridiculous too. That's why they have to say some guy jumped 10 miles. To make everyone else look as dumb as they know they look.

Answer 8

the terms are used to differentiate between evolution that has been observed vs. the evolution that has been created by artists.

This is necessary because when talking to someone who believes in evolution, they always throw some microevolutionary fact in your face in order to prove macroevolution. As if 2 birds having diferrent size beaks explains how a water reptile turned into a bird.

It's just not the same thing. One has been observed, the other has not.

Answer 9

Edward Cuthbert Moncrief, of Jesu Street, Ottery St. Mary, Devon, UK.

There was nothing on the telly, and he felt a need to occupy the time between tea and dinner.

Answer 10

Actually, there is a difference: Macroevolution is a change that involves speciation. Microevolution is when the population is always comprised of the same species.

Answer 11

This Russian guy, Yuri Filipchenko.

This classification has always been controversial, though, and most legitimate scientists today prefer to speak simply of "evolution."

Nowadays, it's mostly "religious" interests who use these terms.