Think about it: If you're born in another country -- Austria, for example, to borrow the example of a certain Governator -- and then you travel to the U.S., you have the status of being an "alien" -- which is a legal description of a person, yes? I mean a person isn't an "alien" because of some kind of "natural" phenomenon, but because of legal terminology. Am I right?
Then if you're an Austrian who take the U.S. citizenship test and pass, and then you swear an oath to be loyal to the U.S., then **poof** you've been turned in to a citizen, which is also a legal description. But this is called "naturalization."
What's nature got to do with it? The government changed it's legal description of what you **are** but your genetic makeup didn't change.
Indeed, some people will still call you a "foreigner" as soon as they hear your accent.
Can someone help me figure out why the government called this change-'em-from-an-alien-to-a-citizen event "naturalization"...?
2007-09-06
06:11:08
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
(That was supposed to come out as "change 'em from an alien to a citizen" with dashes between those words.)
2007-09-06
06:12:28 ·
update #1
Yes, Manfred, you're right. I should have said "misnomer," not "oxymoron."
2007-09-07
04:40:14 ·
update #2