How do you think the nuclear issue with Iran will be solved?

Question

Iran insists it won't give up its nuclear program, sanctions doesnt seem to (won't) hurt them much

military action is too deadly and disastrous.....whats the best solution and what do you predict?

Answer 1

I feel it will inevitably be resolved with military action.

Whether it is a small scale strike - bombing nuclear sites (actual and suspected), military and air-defense installations, and a few government buildings - or on a larger one - all of the above, plus a full-scale invasion, is anyones guess.

The Iranian regime won't give us any other option. Ahmadenijad himself has said that, "there is no stopping the [Iranian] nuclear train." He won't negotiate. He wants to "wipe Israel off the map" and I believe him.

Iran is the Nazi Germany of the 21st Century, and Ahmadenijad is the new Adolf Hitler: History is beginning to repeat itself, and we cannot afford to sit by and let it happen...

Answer 2

The US will keep on dwelling on the subject till a very long time. Also it is understood that this deterrent for Iran is a must since most of the countries around are nuclear. Over and above it is an energy issue with economics impacts since in the coming ten years oil will be scarce and with nuclear energy Iran will have more oil to export and make bigger revenues. Iran will never be a nuclear power and the US will never stop its position. This is not a G.Bush matter it is a socio economic matter.

Answer 3

The best solution in an ideal world would be the world community would insist they stop and attack them with an international coalition in a month if they don't. The problem is that nations such as Russia and China don't have too many close friends and enjoy the problem that causes for us and the region. They will prolong it as long as possible to injure the interests and prestige of the US. Right now it looks as if we will try to isolate Iran and restrict their progress as much as possible. We will build up the military of their rivals in the region and get ready for World War III which will be the shortest war in history and may leave Iran a radioactive hellhole. That is assuming that the leaders of Iran are as nutty as they talk.

Answer 4

Let Iran have the nuclear power. China and Russia are both seriously corrupt. Once Russia found a lost nuclear bomb in an unguarded mineshaft. Pakistan has nuclear weapons and much more terrorists than Iran. Iran isn't very good at building things. That's why Iran losses 100,000 people in earthquakes the rest of the world literally shakes off. Chances are their reactors will just fall apart and they will nuke themselves when the next earthquake hits.

Answer 5

Well here's a easy one : A Liberal Democrat becomes President and brings are troops home. Then Iraq becomes a safe haven for Terrorist .This is after the slot ter of many Iraq citizens! Terrorist acquire Nuclear Bombs from Iraq . Liberal Pres. cuts defence spending in half gets rid of the over payed CIA . Then one day (with in a year 2 at the most) the Pres. along with friends are working to drain more taxes out of Americans they soon realize it wont matter. They hear a strange sound far away so they look out the window and see a bright lite BOOOOOMMMMM ............. good night America

Answer 6

if you think military action is too "deadly and disastrous"....how do you feel about isreal being nuked?

that might be a tad bit "deadly"....and lord knows it would be "disastrous".... but hey! go ahead...take military action off the table...

talk with them until you are blue in the face...and they will never listen to reason... drag out more little UN sanctions... get treatys signed.... use diplomacy and pat yourself on the back that you have brought iran into line without firing a shot...it won't work....

they will sign, laugh at the "infidels", keep you talking and continue on their happy little way to destruction .....

military might....that is the only thing that will "solve" the problem...

dig it or don't...

Answer 7

Through proper diplomatic relations on their turf respecting their culture. Might help if we stop with the oil grabs as well. We might also want to try reintroducing Gold and Silver currency here in the US. Might ask and see where the good fishing spots are in Iran. Take a boat and drop a couple of lines. It's funny how almost all societies can agree on one thing, and that is fishing. I believe the answer to be just that simple. Might help if we send a man this time as well. No offense to you ladies. My final summary on this issue is that peaceful negotiations and solution can be achieved successfully.

Bow is correct as well.

Answer 8

Hopefully Ron Paul is elected and he puts a stop to it by not further threatening Iran. Israel has hundreds of nukes. Ahmadinejad isn't a complete idiot. He isn't going to bring about MAD on his country in which he has approval ratings of about 15%.

It would be idiotic to attack Iran. We don't want to make this reactionary Islamist Keynesian Socialist nutcase of a president more popular. Iran has a democratically elected government. We merely need to wait for the next elections when Ahmadinejad's party is kicked out of power.

The younger Iranians (of course, their median age is 25, so that's most of them, though not all vote yet) do not share the hatred for America that the older generations have (nor do Iranian women wear burquas, as they've defied the government's laws repeatedly and forced Ahmadinejad to try to get them to compromise). In 2004, Fahrenheit 9/11 was aired in Iran and the Iranians thought it was unfair to America.

The Iranian people don't support their government, so why not just let their government crumble. In the meantime, we should stop telling our "allies" what they can and can't do. We should let Israel do anything that it believes is in its national security interests (our support for Israel, which actually weakens Israel, is one of the main reasons why the terrorists attack us). If we listen to George Washington and adopt armed neutrality as our foreign policy, we'll be much better off, as will be the Middle East. We should have no entangling alliances and we should not police the world or engage in utopian nation-builidng. However, we should have unconditional free trade with all nations (instead of this socialist WTO nonsense that has actually gone in and changed our tax code in the past so that we could remain "upstanding members" of this cartel). America should also pull out of NATO, the UN, the World Bank (which actually cheats 3rd world countries and the taxpayers in developed countries for the profits of a few rich bankers), the IMF, and all other Globalist organizations to protect our national sovereignty. We should repeal NAFTA to prevent the North American Union (also known as the "Security and Prosperity Partnership" see: http://spp.gov ).

We need a massive shift in our foreign policy if we want to best serve our own interests.

Answer 9

Decode this lyrics ' Torn between two lovers" The last words from the late poor old Saddam. Without the approval of the late Yasser Arafat. Decode this lyrics " Ocean deep" In messing up "The king and I" Decode this lyrics " Beat it" May get run out of town. With the dead Mummy being nail back into the coffin. Luke 8.17

Answer 10

This is a non-issue, Iran has never been aggressive against any country. Actual issue is USA who wants to attack for some other purpose and uses nuclear issue as just an excuse.