Yea, that makes Genesis a whole lot more believable.
2007-09-05 18:05:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The fact that matter can come from energy, and visa versa does not create something out of nothing. There are finite amounts of both matter and energy, and they are made out of the same stuff, various particles. Some particles just happen to have mass and be effected by gravity while others don't. Not having mass is no different from not interacting with the strong nuclear force (like leptons)
Also, for the record, you don't have your information correct, individual Quarks don't have masses even close to that of an atom, the sum of all of the particles generated had more mass than the original atoms, but the top quarks themselves were just the points where the mass increases.
Anyway, this in now way proves the existance of God, it just proves the feasibility of the atomic bomb, and Einstein's famous E=mc^2. It also corresponds rather well with the big bang of course.
2007-09-06 01:04:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by yelxeH 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science has a theory that something came from nothing because nothing is an unstable condition and energy at est would measure zero check Victor Stenger physicist.
there is little room for superstitious thinking and supernatural presumptions in this day and age of knowledge and scientific
advantage . your leap from rational to irrational is deplorable .
peace through understanding
2007-09-06 01:05:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by dogpatch USA 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Astro Physics has nothing to do with GOD, "or" the other way around. To prove HOW the Lord created all things in the heavens takes more INTELLIGENCE than any human is capable of and will NEVER be solved. WHY ? Astro Physics may explain energy or "gases" but doesn't explain WHERE they came from in the vast VOID of nothingness in SPACE............
2007-09-06 01:13:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ultimately all matter is made of condensed energy but that doesn't mean something comes from nothing. Energy is not nothing.
2007-09-06 01:28:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pretty unlikely that the sum of matter+energy after > before the collision.
IOW, unlikely that energy/matter was "created" by this evenit.
Cordially,
John
http://www.GodSci.org
2007-09-06 01:01:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by John 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Might be something to what you say, or mightn't.
Quantum physics is new enough to have a long way to go. It's only chipping away at the tip of the iceberg with an ice pick.
2007-09-06 01:02:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jack P 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, it's not "proof"..
I think you are scientifically illiterate and apply infantile analogies and childlike logic to things which you know nothing about in order to make room for your magic sky fairy..
Prove me wrong..
2007-09-06 01:11:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by microbesrule_lifeprevails 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it only demonstrates that matter is so easy to create out of nothing that even scientists can do it for fun.
2007-09-06 01:02:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Matter can come from energy" â "creating something out of nothing"
'Energy' and 'nothing' aren't the same thing. See how absurd that is?
2007-09-06 01:02:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋