Well the first problem is, where does the Oyster Card allow you to travel ... Here is a hint LONDON! Where do Mainline trains go ... ALL over the UK. It is one of the biggest pain in the backsides when some twit of a train passenger tries to get off the train with an Oyster outside London.
Ken Livingstone and TFL want any train coming into the London Zone to allow Oyster on board. The TOC companies have asked if they are willing to pay for the upgrade of all Stations, Supply the Card readers every Ticket Guard, Revenue Officer, Conductor, Train Manager, etc and Pay for the training that each member of staff that is concerned with Ticket Sales and Enquires (This includes all Platform Assistants, gateline staff, etc) and the overtime this will require to cover their normal shifts. Install alongside the multi style systems to connect with the 10 differnet styles of Ticket selling systems availiable throughout the country so that the system would work. Plus the remote payment system where Oyster PrePay can be installed.
Finally There is then the problem of decideing who gets what percentage of money the tickets cost, dont forget with ATOC agreements, each company gets a certain cut of a ticket if more than one company exists on a particular route, unless the ticket is restricted to that company only.
2007-09-06 10:34:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kevan M 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because there is a differant regulating company for over ground tickets.
Mind over the next few years when a train franchise becomes availble, the companies bidding to run the trains on that route will have to install gateline which will accept tickets like the Oyster Cards.
2007-09-06 02:21:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joolz of Salopia 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
The "Oyster Card" was brought in by the lovely and wonderful K.Livingstone Esq, Mayor of London (and thinks he's God too but that's another story!) so that they could use it on the Underground AND the buses. It soon became popular and the public started to ask for it to be made available for use on the "main line" (for want of a more suitable term!) railways as well, but as usual, up came the shout "We'll lose money" or "We won't get our fair share" - so the argument goes on, and until such times as ALL the various companies that operate in and around London (and eventually perhaps over the whole country) come to some agreement, availability of the oyster card on those 'other' lines will, to say the least, "be sketchy" ! ! !
2007-09-05 22:06:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
at the start i could want to applaud you for worrying plenty, no longer many people could tackle any such youthful horse understanding she won't in any respect have the skill for use for something yet a paddock better half. Secondly you're suited to be concerned, a million which you're feeling she could have some training & 2 that she would have the skill to administration the stress of donning a rider. If i grow to be on your place i does no longer even evaluate allowing a rider (of any length) on her back till she is a minimum of four, she continues to be an extremely youthful horse & is yet to mature, maximum horses are began around the age of three, yet together with her having earlier had leg subject concerns, i could be susceptible to permit her to have added time to strengthen, mature & heal, as you were not initially making plans to have her as a driving horse, this could not be an issue besides, this is only giving her the appropriate start up, little question the actuality that she is so youthful has alot to do with the vet feeling she will heal nicely adequate to hold a rider. supply her yet another few months to get well, emotionally & bodily from her trauma, only enable her to be a horse for a at the same time as as quickly as she is completely cellular, then slowly introduce her her to some easy artwork on the floor, lunging, enjoying etc That way she would be better than waiting to take the subsequent step onto donning a rider, for the duration of all of the foundation & common training your coach buddy would have the skill to inform if there is any lasting soreness, as will your vet. If there isn't any longer I doubt there will be any problem in any respect together with her skill to hold a bigger rider, if she is a huge horse & she has nicely shaped muscle capability it rather is geared up up with the aid of the years, the load of the rider would have little or no signifigance to her skill to be ridden. in actuality from own journey I have little question that in spite of each thing the care you have given her, she would be extra then satisfied to undergo that burden, maximum horses objective to delight. stable good fortune & nicely carried out.
2016-12-31 13:57:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the UK had a truly intergrated transport sytem they would. Because the UK has relentlessly followed privatisation and separate cost centres for everything we dont get an integrated transport system and hence your dilemma. Would be nice to blame it all on weee Ken but I guess even he cannot sort out that which is not (in the business and commercial sense) part of London transport.
UK transport prices are way over the top in any case. Compare with Madrid - 1 euro metro fare to/from anywhere in the city on the metro system, including the airport. Brussels - 10 ride ticket (unlimited period of validity) for 10 euros usable on any metro and bus with each ride possibly including mix of buses, trams and metro within 2 hours. Single ride ticket costs about 2 euros. Single train ride from airport to city = 2.80 euros. Berlin - a "normal" ticket valid on any mix of train, metro, bus within a 2 hour period. Long time since I was there but was equivalent to about 1 euro too. Paris is an exception with higher fares and less integration between metro, RER and buses but London and the rest of the UK is incredibly expensive and not tourist friendly at all.
2007-09-05 21:24:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by oldhombre 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
due to an ongoing argument between the overground rail companies and transport for london as to who's going to pay for the installation of this technology at all their stations. Surprise surprise, neither side wants to pay!
2007-09-05 13:06:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jim C 2
·
4⤊
0⤋