Yes, they are called cannibals
Taste - don't know personally, but here is an account:
Prior to 1931, New York Times reporter William Buehler Seabrook, in the interests of research, obtained from a hospital intern at the Sorbonne a chunk of human meat from the body of a healthy human killed by accident, and cooked and ate it. He reported that, "It was like good, fully developed veal, not young, but not yet beef. It was very definitely like that, and it was not like any other meat I had ever tasted. It was so nearly like good, fully developed veal that I think no person with a palate of ordinary, normal sensitiveness could distinguish it from veal. It was mild, good meat with no other sharply defined or highly characteristic taste such as for instance, goat, high game, and pork have. The steak was slightly tougher than prime veal, a little stringy, but not too tough or stringy to be agreeably edible. The roast, from which I cut and ate a central slice, was tender, and in color, texture, smell as well as taste, strengthened my certainty that of all the meats we habitually know, veal is the one meat to which this meat is accurately comparable."
2007-09-05 09:59:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Corinthian 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
All I can think of is one of the plane crash survivors in the Andes (the subject of the book "Alive,") said in an exploitive knock-off book that "it really does taste like chicken." The accuracy of that book has always been questionable. (Not "Alive;" the knockoff.)
2007-09-05 10:00:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't really think you'll get any honest answers on this one, hon.
2007-09-05 09:54:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by lissabeth 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
easy to enough to find out!
Bite your finger or tongue and chew..
But if you really want to know contact these people
http://members.aol.com/porkinsr6/alive.html
2007-09-05 09:57:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by M X 3
·
0⤊
0⤋