English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

hmm

the 2 or 3 proved fakes will not do, there should be millions of these tranistional animals in the fossil record.....jokers

2007-09-05 07:12:17 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

28 answers

Please go do a little more reaserch. Where are your transitional bibles? There are like the first 350 years of your religion missing. Yet you claim evolution is false because we don't have a complete fossil record for 3.5 billion years or so? Do you not see the problem with your terrible logic?

2007-09-05 07:18:33 · answer #1 · answered by Gawdless Heathen 6 · 5 1

The reason we have more dinosaur fossils then transitional mammals and early human fossils is time. Dinosaurs were around for over 170 million years. Mammals a lot less then that, and humans around 2 million. That gave dinosaur more time and chances for their bones to end up fossilized.

2015-01-05 14:56:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

These morons use wikipedia. They are destined to believe a lie. Lucy is a human 9 year old girl. Not half ape-half human. There are no transitional fossils they are all just different species that God created. Evolutionists are morons. They use definitions of explanations of certain species from writings on websites. They never have even seen an actual transitional fossil with their own eyes. They think they are so smart yet, they are putting faith into something they can't see. They call both parents having black hair and their offspring having brown evolution. Oh yeah they say it happens over millions of years so that it makes sense. Meanwhile, even over millions of years, which no one is around that long to study, they still can't find a shred of evidence supporting actual transitional fossils.

2007-09-05 07:26:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

***HOW MANY COFFINS, desks, billiard tables would be filled with the supposed number of transitional bones or fossils for humans?
------ANSWERS------
--Newsweek: “‘You could put all the fossils on the top of a SINGLE DESK (my caps),’ said Elwyn Simons of Duke University.”10
--The New York Times: “The known fossil remains of man’s ancestors would fit on A BILLIARD (my caps) table. That makes a poor platform from which to peer into the mists of the last few million years.”11
--Science Digest: “The remarkable fact is that all the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a SINGLE coffin! . . . Modern apes, for instance, seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern humans—of upright, naked, toolmaking, big-brained beings—is, if we are to be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter.”12
*** ce chap. 5 p. 59 par. 15 Letting the Fossil Record Speak ***
--SWEDISH BOTANIST Heribert Nilsson described the situation this way, after 40 years of his own research: “It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of palaeobiological facts. The fossil material is now so complete that . . . the lack of transitional series cannot be explained as due to the scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real, they will never be filled.”15
--22 D. B. Gower to comment, as related in England’s Kentish Times: “The creation account in Genesis and the theory of evolution could not be reconciled. One must be right and the other wrong. The story of the fossils agreed with the account of Genesis. In the oldest rocks we did not find a series of fossils covering the gradual changes from the most primitive creatures to developed forms, but rather in the oldest rocks, developed species suddenly appeared. Between every species there was a COMPLETE ABCENSE (my caps) of intermediate fossils.”24
--29 New Scientist noted that evolution “predicts that a complete fossil record would consist of lineages of organisms showing gradual change continuously over long periods of time.” But it admitted: “Unfortunately, the fossil record does not meet this expectation, for individual species of fossils are rarely connected to one another by known intermediate forms. . . . known fossil species do indeed appear not to evolve even over millions of years.”31 And geneticist Stebbins writes: “No transitional forms are known between any of the major phyla of animals or plants.” He speaks of “the large gaps which exist between many major categories of organisms.”32

--AS FAR AS dinosaurs, there are no transitional bones, THEY APPEARED as the rest of creation did!
***IMPRESSIVE LISTING our resident evolutionists have, so was the "black listing" in the MaCarthey fiasco of falseness, besides where are the authorities behind those "amazing" facts?

2007-09-05 07:25:33 · answer #4 · answered by THA 5 · 2 0

Oh you mean like the bones that are in the smithsonian? Or the bones in the musuems of natural history all across the world? Or perhaps you're talking about the complete carcass of a wooly mammoth that is currently on display? Maybe the bones of fish would be good? Or how about the fact there are fish alive today that are the same as they were 100 million years ago, You sir are an idiot.

2007-09-05 07:20:02 · answer #5 · answered by Frenchghost 3 · 4 1

first of all yes there are some othese bones but moste of the m have been destroyed by time and some haven't been, found, second of all no we should'nt have millions of them because not every bone is fossilized most of them are crushed and how many dinosaur bones do you think we have millions no! more like hundreds

2007-09-05 07:19:08 · answer #6 · answered by V 2 · 0 1

LMAO!!! Don't go there kiddo, really not going to win you any points with the Evolutionists, of course the creationist guys are proubly like "Heck yea eat that!". Realize thou that we can only really search less the oooo lets say 1 percent of the avaliable area's that fossils can be find, not including the darn ocean... but I digress (thats not going to make sense to you anyways) this is splinting hairs on a issue that just peeves off peoples ignorant verison of what gods got plan for us... geeze you guys act like if there was EVOLUTION that means theres no god? WTF! Thats just ignorant, science doesn't disprove god, it just proves what we can. SO don't get your panties in a bind just because theres a POSSIBLITY of evolution out there, ooo god forgive us.... the point is that evolution DOES explain certian natural phomeana in a prodictable way. We need that because it does HELP us figure out how to better handle are environment, and our technology which weather your willing to except it or not, you have COMPLETE faith in (you never thought you computer was going to blow up and kill you did you?) but only have SOME faith in god, but that again is spliting hairs. What you need to realize is that fossils happen as a matter of phonema there not BONES!!! WE DON'T HAVE BONES!!!!! WE HAVE FOSSILS!! Whys that so important? BECAUSE MOST OF THE BONES ARE DISTROIED!!!!! Sometimes (very rarly) they get replaced during the destruction process causing what we call fossils to form, there not bones there rock! So you have to realize not every gosh darn bone is going to fall into a swamp and be there until one of us humans come across it...... besides you don't need to look at FOSSILS to see how there could be evolution.... geeze you people, you proubly still debating about weather we came from monkeies which is just another ignorant view of the theory...... of course it is a THEORY!!!! So always p's me to no end when you guys treat this like its all facts, its not, science doesn't pretend it is, thats why its called a THEORY and not a law.... we have very few laws in science, and lets see you dispute those, but I digress again.... This is just a person trying to continue the old creation/evalutionist debate because it keeps the bible-thumpers happy thinking that science is just a symptom of satan on earth, when weather you know it our not its a symptom of TECHNOLOGY which is why your even here..... shot I was a judice baby, I owe my life to science, weather its right or wrong doesn't matter it is an extention of our love for ourselves and our purpose here on earth, so don't fight it!!!!

2007-09-05 07:40:55 · answer #7 · answered by Brutal Honesty 7 · 1 3

Because God didn't play the evolution game. My guess is you'll hear about the archaeopteryx, Neanderthal man, Nebraska man, and a bunch of other garbage that biology teachers shove down your throat in school. Or somebody will insist that we are the "transitional forms". I don't see how people can believe this nonsense, and then get in a hissy fit when somebody says the word God.

2007-09-05 07:26:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

WHY, indeed, do we have NO fossil record of your Christ?

Bones be Bones, and dinosaur bones have "lasted" for millions of years...
200-odd years should be, as you people say, "a piece of cake".

2007-09-05 07:21:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Do you know what a "transitional animal" is? Everything is transitional. Genetically, my mom is a transitional animal between me and my grandma. Evolution works with small genetic changes from generation to generation.

2007-09-05 07:23:38 · answer #10 · answered by ZombieTrix 2012 6 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers