Just answer these simple questions.
Were Adam and Eve Homo Sapiens?
If so, why are we finding hundreds of skeletons of at least twelve different species that are NOT humans as they are today.
Doesn't this pretty much prove evolution?
And why be so narrow minded? Why couldn't God have been the force that put evolution into effect?
2007-09-05 07:02:20 · 17 answers · asked by rickpetralia 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Obviously nobody understood that I was being sarcastic...
I do not believe that Adam and Eve were the first humans.
I am proving that they were not.
2007-09-05 07:13:45 · update #1
No. They were fictional characters.
2007-09-05 07:05:32 · answer #1 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Excellent question. I'll try to be brief. Adam and Eve were NOT homo-sapiens. They are of an order of being called The Material Sons and Daughters, material and sex-reproducing beings capable of mating with human beings. It is the mission of all the planetary Adams and Eves to arrive on the inhabited worlds (they arrived on Earth only 38,000 years ago) and establish the Violet Race.
By the time of their arrival, humans had evolved from the lower forms of life and had been around for almost a million years.
For more on this fascinating story and this amazing couple, I highly recommend the book Adam and Eve - A Tragic Love Story. This is a serious and scholarly work and I think you'd enjoy it. Good luck to you!
http://www.amazon.com/Adam-Eve-Tragic-Love-Story/dp/0741432722/ref=sr_1_2/105-0328501-1611661?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1189335923&sr=1-2
2007-09-09 00:31:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) That species evolve or change over time is not a modern idea. The classical Greeks had similar proposals. Regardless, just because people haven't given something a fancy name doesn't mean they don't understand it. BTW: while change within a genus over time and small/nearly insignificant increase in alleles has been observed, common ancestry of all life from a single cell has NOT been validated. 2) People had no idea of Biology? You're kidding, right? Even today, modern scientists seek out "shamans" for their knowledge of plants and animals that have been passed down for generations. 3) 6,000 or 100,000... both dates tend to flex depending on who you talk to and when. Relax a little on this one. BTW: If you're worried about inconsistencies, stay away from "scientific" pronouncements. Science regularly changes and updates itself. What was scientifically "true" or certain 10 years ago (or less) is often no longer true. For example, if you plan on trusting science for what to do... Then how do you decide simple things like "Should I eat eggs?" "Is coffee OK to drink? If so, how much?" Scan the literature from the last 10 years. -- Might drive you crazy how many times you would have had to change your eating habits.
2016-05-17 10:02:22 · answer #3 · answered by oliva 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Adam and Eve were humans, same as you and me.
2. Other twelve different species? Yes, other 12 different animals, apes, created by God when he created the other animals.
3. Prove? No.
2007-09-05 07:07:48 · answer #4 · answered by Darth Eugene Vader 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
If you've done any research, you'd find that they have only found ONE set of each different skeleton. If we supposedly evolved, there would have been thousands. As for the skeletons being apelike, they more than likely had a calcium deficiency or a disease like muscular distrophy. Get your facts straight and research into science behind creation and YOU quit being so narrow minded.
2007-09-05 07:09:53 · answer #5 · answered by sum4182girl 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Adaptation may be programmed into our genes but I do not think evolution is. God created Adam and Eve. They did not evolve from goo to ape to human. Most of the fossils found are from extinct chimpanzees (Lucy) and apes.
2007-09-05 07:11:54 · answer #6 · answered by 9_ladydi 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Adam and Eve are part of a story that mankind made up to help explain his origins. You can't mix logic/science and the bible because they are diametrically opposed with one based on fact and observation and the other based on fables, mysticism and having the purpose of swaying opinion toward a belief in god and/or Jesus as a savior.
2007-09-05 07:13:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
No, God couldn't have put evolution into effect and created at the same time. There is no proof of evolution to be found in a few old bones...
Edit: "Prove?" I think not. Your statement is FAR from "proof" of anything beyond your own myopia and hypocrisy.
2007-09-05 07:06:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Why couldn't God have been the force that put evolution into effect?
I think he did, what about you ?
to answer your question it was Homo Evens and Homo Admas :)
2007-09-05 07:11:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
CONGRATS!!!
You have a brain! You, unlike many others, have broken down the fictional barrier, and now you see that not everything that is said adds up.
Doesn't the bones themselves prove evolution exists?
I'm glad to know that their are actually down to earth people left in this world, thank you.
Now, lets laugh at what the others say... he he he..
2007-09-05 07:08:18 · answer #10 · answered by thankgodformaryjane 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Bible says that God created us in our present form. THAT is why evolution is a threat to the Bible. You can argue that God put evolution into motion all you want - but it is still against what the Bible teaches.
No, they werent homosapiens. THey were fictional characters in a story.
2007-09-05 07:06:37 · answer #11 · answered by ? 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋