http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={17E83FB7-5695-4F36-AC08-D87BCB5C51CE}
http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory/story_id/5223/edition_id/96/format/html/displaystory.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3854/is_200107/ai_n8983215/pg_11
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/moonbatcentral/2005/04/socialist-prof-pluss-is-purged-but.html
http://www.moonbatcentral.com/wordpress/
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/moonbatcentral/2005/04/socialist-prof-pluss-is-purged-but.html
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=DiscoverTheNetwork
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/search/?cx=013255222075609514560%3Avfcebs4vcuo&q=ponte&sa=Search&cof=FORID%3A11&cx=013255222075609514560%3Avfcebs4vcuo#1006
http://www.newsmax.com/lowell_ponte/Labor_Day/2007/08/30/28692.html
http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={201608E1-4222-4BCE-AD63-ACBF71C0B0B6}
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={2CB7C9D4-1514-4890-91CA-B1667590CCEB}
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/2/14/160148.shtml
2007-09-05 05:46:13 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel ➔ Italy ➔ Bologna
Sorry Gent. Didn't mean to make you whimper. Maybe my post on this one will help. Just trying to publicize the Pied Piper of Jello and his fellows
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AujIbAXIMa7hUhJGelNyMOkS.Rd.?qid=20070905040723AA9uqvn
2007-09-05 06:35:16 · update #1
Thanks Amber. I'll tell ya, I put a more readable version on another post. Yahoo doesn't give you many characters in a question. Peace!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ai4lFA2tqcXS7hl1wxW7i0Xty6IX?qid=20070905040723AA9uqvn&show=7#profile-info-uSOeIWo6aa
2007-09-05 07:26:52 · update #2
Marc I agree about the sites. That doesn't mean to me that they should be ignored. Pretty much everything I've seen posted on here is included in his writing. He also says all of the things that go with them, that would get you kicked out of here. I remember the Red Baiting era, and seeing the McCarthy era on television. It was a shameful chapter in our country's history. It's all the more shameful when the culprits wrap themselves in the flag.
2007-09-05 09:57:11 · update #3
I appreciate your post and others about Arrehnius. I knew Pervcival Lowell had discussed the Greenhouse Effect in 1894, but I'll bet Arrehnius was his source. He was the world's leading expert on the behavior of gases in his day!
2007-09-05 10:01:20 · update #4
If I were Afratta437, it wuld be a distinct improvement!
2007-09-05 11:53:27 · update #5
It all makes you wonder what we'll be on about in another 30 years.
2007-09-06 02:38:19 · answer #1 · answered by fyzer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not particularly, since I know the theory of greenhouse warming was kicked around by Arrehnius in 1896 or so and has been under study more or less since then.
Front page Mag, Moonbat, newsmax, sourcewatch, and the rest of the sites you are listing are worthless in determining anything about, well, anything.
2007-09-05 09:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by Marc G 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i wish i had time to read all these now, unfortunately i can't spend the time this second, but i just wanted to thank you and everyone else here on the site that are trying to keep the truth out there even with jello and his minions
oh and i'd like to thank answers for my "my answer to a better planet" ecobag i got in the mail yesterday, and the bulb i got a month or so ago
no problem, keep at it
2007-09-05 07:09:21 · answer #3 · answered by amber 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Global Warming was started by Margaret Thatcher (of course, she had to end the Global Cooling propaganda to do this) because the coal workers were on strike and she needed to get back at them. In the 70s, there was a guy promoting this Global Warming theory and people asked BBC why they gave him a documentary (this was mentioned in 'The Great Global Warming Swindle'). Of course, it became the party line when it was politically useful to the government.
2007-09-05 06:10:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
What kind of "question" is this?
Are we supposed to read every one of these articles, without a clue what they're about? just to provide you a response without even knowing what you're referencing by the words "it all"? Isn't it your job to systhesize all this into an intelligible question?
"Skeptic or denier" of what?
Why am I even bothering with you? Sheesh.
2007-09-05 05:57:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
From your link:
"Politics, in other words, is not limited to the debates of lawmakers nor to elections in which the public votes every two years. Politics is now all-pervasive, injecting itself and playing an often-destructive role in areas of life we used to believe were a-political, clean and objective.
Science, for example, once appeared to be the pure pursuit of truth and knowledge by priest-like men and women dressed in white garments."
Yes, global warming has nothing to do with science. It is a political battle between the left who base science on emotions and the right who base science on objective facts.
Dude - Why don't your yahoo links work? Have to make up more information?
2007-09-05 05:55:22 · answer #6 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 9⤊ 5⤋
lay of the drugs man. or are you still getting flashbacks from the stuff in the 60's?
2007-09-05 10:04:09 · answer #7 · answered by afratta437 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋