2007-09-05 02:51:24 · 11 answers · asked by csn0331 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Yes.. accept it must be 2000 miles long.
http://www.weneedafence.com
http://www.numbersusa.com
http://www.immigrationcounters.com
http://www.usillegalaliens.com/impacts_of_illegal_immigration_economic_costs.html
http://www.immigrationshumancost.org/
http://www.fightingimmigrationanarchy.com/
http://www.numbersusa.com/PDFs/Share%20of%20native%20workers%20by%20occup%20-%202003.pdf
http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com
http://www.bankofamericaboycott.com/
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0706/p09s01-coop.html
http://www.illegalimmigrationjournal.com/
http://www.usillegalaliens.com/impacts_of_illegal_immigration_crime.html
2007-09-05 03:53:27 · answer #1 · answered by Captain Tomak 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes
but I'd look into a different passive barrier along the Rio Grande (dredging?) because if we can find one as effective, I'd like not to cut our folks off from a waterway. However, cameras isn't enough, since even when ICE gets calls from local police that they have illegals in custody ICE only comes for the big numbers or crimes. It needs to be a passive deterrent.
Although the zero tolerance policy in Del Rio was also effective. Maybe counties along the Rio Grande that don't want a fence could opt into a program with a zero tolerance policy AND cameras/sensors instead - but a lot of them would have to stop being sanctuary cities in order to do that.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/17/AR2006061700455.html
2007-09-05 11:43:22 · answer #2 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why bother if the Fed's won't enforce immigration laws?
The fence would interfere with the NAU agenda so I doubt it will ever be finished.
2007-09-05 10:01:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That fence is a 100% political "throw money at it" failure.
If I were a mexican trying to cross the border, that stupid fence would not even slow me down.
Ridiculous waste of money, time and resources.
2007-09-05 10:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
It would be too costly, and to ineffective to be worth while.
We have fences now. They can be climbed over, dug under, flown over, and lots of other things.
It's not a fence we need; it's enforcement of immigration laws.
2007-09-05 09:59:47 · answer #5 · answered by ghouly05 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes, definitely. It would be a great start to ending illegal immigration.
2007-09-05 10:24:13 · answer #6 · answered by HWG 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Only if it is complete with motion sensors and automated turrets
2007-09-05 09:56:46 · answer #7 · answered by ferengifighter 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-09-05 09:54:36 · answer #8 · answered by Deidre K 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I do not. This is militarizing the border, which is never a good thing.
2007-09-05 09:54:53 · answer #9 · answered by mustagme 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
YES !!!!
CLOSE THE BORDERS , NOW !!!!!
2007-09-05 10:28:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋