Eclectic. There are others, but you got the main ones. :)
Edit:
"The 1734 Tradition is based on the teachings, writings (published and personal), and the inspiration of Robert Cochrane. 1734 is not an anagram, however, it IS a riddle. It does not give the true name of the Goddess as there are many names of the Goddess...all True. Within the 1734 tradition there are a number of riddles. When all are answered, and not until then, a dilligent student will understand this tradition.
There are many paths to the Gods and Goddesses. 1734 is one distinct path and not for everyone. There are many things about 1734 that are different: The placement of the elements; The firm dedication that the Clan is one's spiritual family; the necessary shamanic essence; and Not believing in the Goddess, but knowing her as an every day part of your life .
1734 is a Non-profit Religious Corporation under the laws of the state of California, USA. 1734 is exempt from Federal and State income under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. "
2007-09-05 02:18:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
1734 is a witchcraft tradition, not a Wiccan one.
Wicca is generally divided into Traditonals and Eclectics. Tradtionals are broken down into Traditions such as Gardnerian, Alexandrian, etc.
I'm an eclectic, which means I piece together my own practices instead of following a more rigid set of practices and beliefs taught to me by a coven. Some eclectics like to further define their practices as something like "celtic", but that's so vague as to not really mean anything. Most people call themselves "celtic" if they follow a Celtic deity, but sicne there are hundreds of them, two "Celtic Wiccans" can easily have nothing in common other than a broad Wiccan framework: they could follow different gods, celebrate the Sabbats differently, work with different symbols, etc.
2007-09-05 04:51:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nightwind 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
You are quite correct about the 1734 being a clue to the name of the Goddess in that Tradition, and not anything to do with a founding date.
As for the different types of Wicca, well....that would depend on who you ask.
Since I'm answering, this is my answer:
WICCA is the term used for a group of *oath-bound, lineage, initiatory* Traditions of Witchcraft.
This excludes eclectics, self-taughts, and IRABOs***
WICCA honors both a God and Goddess as equals - their names may vary from coven to coven, but they are NOT "any God or Goddess we feel like working with right at this moment" or "any God or Goddess that I just read about and think sound cool"
This excludes eclectics, self-taughts, IRABOs and Dianics (because of the BOTH God and Goddess part).
*** IRABO = I Read A Book, Once
As for myself, I am not a Wiccan of any type. I have not been trained in, nor initiated into, a Wiccan Tradition.
I am a Witch.
My current practice is the NROOGD Tradition.
2007-09-05 09:51:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Raven's Voice 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are many Wiccan paths, I studied a form of Romany Wicca, then some Celtic and Saxon Wicca...
I am at present just embarking on another path, which is Egyptian Wicca...
I have been a Wiccan for 37 years and I am definitely Eclectic, but I am far, far from mainstream Wicca...
Blessed Be... )O(
2007-09-05 02:07:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bunge 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
There are many, many, many others.
I'm UEW, personally.
Have some others: http://www.witchvox.com/xtrads.html
Bear in mind that not all there are Wiccan, and those need to be submitted BY trad members, so some aren't honest. Also, some of the trads have changed a LOT from the time their essay was posted, and haven't edited their profile because they want to keep their hits high. (whatever, the one from my trad went from 30,000 to 4,000 but now the essay's 100% better) so I'd be wary of one with a profile over a couple years old. (The info may be good, but the contacts may've changed.)
2007-09-05 02:13:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by LabGrrl 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
You forgot Corellian (sp?) I was Gardnerian, but I wasn't comfortable with some of the practices and I just went back to being a solitary Green?Eclectic/Witch
2007-09-05 02:21:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by humanrayc 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I was eclectic, and my path was healing.
I can't think of any others at the moment, but since I was a solitary practitioner, I didn't really get into the different "types" of Wicca.
I hope it's okay for me to answer as a former Wiccan.
2007-09-05 01:58:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
this question is complicated by way of fact it always comes from human beings no longer information what Wicca is. For me, there is two super divisions: Eclectics and Traditionals. once you're interpreting on your individual (analyzing books, etc.) you're an Eclectic. once you're being experienced by way of a coven which will at last initiate you, you're a Traditionalist. there are various diverse Traditions, regardless of the shown fact that for the time of many circumstances understanding which custom does not fairly inform you lots, by way of fact the fairly defining areas of their ideals are saved secret from the non-initiated. some Eclectics experience the ought to function adjectives to "Wiccan" to describe them. each and every thing from what subculture they are form of interested in (i.e. Celtic Wiccan), to colours (i.e. green Wiccan), to names that recommend no longer something in any respect to me. those words mean something to listeners that they shouldn't; i.e. that each and each team is, nicely a team. they are not. talk with two "Celtic Wiccans" and you need to truly locate they have no longer something in consumer-friendly different than they are the two Wiccans. and then different, new Wiccans pay attention this, and that they think of "oh, i choose an adjective too. i choose a style of Wicca." no, you do no longer. in my view, i think of it is form of grandstanding, making oneself sound like they belong to issues that don't fairly exist. and then there are some Wiccans who declare to be stick to a "branch" which fairly has no longer something to do with Wicca, like Stregha. Stregha isn't a branch of Wicca. It has no longer something to do with Wicca. it is Italian witchcraft. So do no longer subject approximately looking a fancy call for your self. Wiccan could be high quality. Eclectic Wiccan in case you go with to get greater specific. @MSB: in case you dislike the "neo-Wiccan" term, end utilising it. it is fairly that easy. it fairly is a marginally rude term used basically approximately solely by way of Traditionals who do no longer choose to be linked with Eclectics. As such, it is call calling.
2016-10-19 22:30:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by dudderar 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I consider myself Eclectic.
2007-09-05 02:05:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by BlueManticore 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
My brother used to practice Wicca. I'm thinking he was Celtic, but I'm not sure.
2007-09-05 02:00:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kevin 4
·
2⤊
1⤋