Anti-science or anti-superstitious ? I suggest watching The Universe on The History channel...?

Answer 1

very good idea if it is done with an open mind and pure truth is what is sought. If one can watch the JV without any preconceived ideas, than it is great. We can learn from anything and every where.

Answer 2

I do watch the history channel a lot, they do tend to lean towards evolution. I myself am a christian though I do find a lot of their assumpions interesting, after all, most people on this planet don't believe in evolution anyway, I personally love science, I love they study of the stars, Of cousre I do know who created them and it was God, the Bible says so. Its the best selling book of all time for a reason, there is power in its words. Look at Isreal, all that fuss in the middle east over a piece of property no bigger than Rhode Island. The bible is correct, evolutionists are wrong, Jesus died for your sins and mine on a cross, the bibles says that without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins, and the wages of sin is death. Christ came as the perfect sacrifice for our sins, when he arose from the grave he washed away our sins forever, would you like to be saved, Jesus says a man must be born again or he cannot enter into the kingdom of Heaven, just say this Prayer believing and ye shall be saved. Dear Jesus, I know and confess that I am sinner in need of salvation. I believe you died on a cross
and arose from the grave to wash away my sins, I ask you right now to come into my heart and save me, I pray this Prayer believing in the name of Jesus Amen. If you prayed this prayer with a sincere heart you are now a child of God, rejoice that your name is written in the Lambs book of Life. If you have any questions just send me an email, God Bless YOU!!

Answer 3

Antiscience is a position critical of science and the scientific method. Antiscientific views generally claim that science is non-objective method generating non-universal knowledge, and that scientific reductionism is flawed. Antiscience criticises the perceived power and influence of science, and objects to what proponents perceive as an arrogant or closed-minded attitude amongst scientists.[1] Antiscience has been used to refer to both the New Age and postmodernist movements associated with the political Left, and to socially conservative and fundamentalist movements associated with the political Right.

History

Those involved in the beginnings of the scientific revolution such as Robert Boyle found themselves in immediate and direct confrontation with those such as Thomas Hobbes who were extremely skeptical regarding whether what we now think of as the scientific method was a satisfactory way to obtain genuine knowledge of the nature of the world. Hobbes' stance is today seen by many as an anti-science position.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in Discourse on the Arts and Sciences, is noted for claiming science leads to morality's corruption.

Anti-science issues are seen as a fundamental consideration in the transition from 'pre-science' or 'proto-science' such as that evident in Alchemy. Many disciplines which pre-date the widespread adoption and acceptance of the scientific method, such as geometry and astronomy, are not seen as anti-science.

Nonetheless, some of the orthodoxies within those disciplines which pre-date a scientific approach (such as those orthodoxies repudiated by the discoveries of Galileo) are seen as being a product of an anti-science stance.

The term 'scientism' is sometimes used as a pejorative description, in the sense that individuals to whom this is attributed are claimed to be 'fetishizing' science, or treating science in a similar way to a religion.

The term reductionism is occasionally used in a similarly pejorative way (as a somewhat more subtle attack on scientists) although scientists can now be found who recognise the conceptual and philosophical shortcomings of reductionism but feel nonetheless comfortable in being labelled as reductionists.[citation needed]William Blake in his paintings and writings, reacted strongly against the work of Isaac Newton and is seen as being perhaps the earliest (and almost certainly the most prominent and enduring) example of what is seen by historians as being the aesthetic anti-science

Answer 4

To me it does not matter if one believes in the Big Bang theory and evolution. It is entirely possible that God set everything into motion. Why do the two have to be mutually exclusive. Each belief has room for the other.
Peace

Answer 5

Not only did I watch it I TAPED it! Those who spoke on that documentary can give BOATH sides of the 'discussion' a lesson in orderly observation as well as reason. Oh yeah ,did you hear a few of them use the word, CREATION? So you guys out there THINK!

Answer 6

I suggest watching "The Religion of Evolution" on NRB

Answer 7

I don't mind watching history channel or anything superstitious. But i don't belive what science said anything regard to holy bible.

Answer 8

I love the history channel. Wish I could get it. In the meantime I have my bible and you have your lies. So good luck to you. See ya judgement day.

Answer 9

May your everlasting soul be brought into peace and the light that is granted from our Lord, Your Lord he is One and there is no other Al hamdoullah. May your home be filled with love and peace as its time for peace and love for that is all that is left and that is all we cry and beg for amin.Salam

Answer 10

That's hard to answer.I love science and I am superstitious.

(Many blessings)