I don't understand how Jesus is related to Kind David because was Mary in the blood line of David, and if she was tell me that scripture because I know Joseph was in the blood line of King David But he was not Jesus DAD so that DOESN'T COUNT???
Jeremiah chapter 23 verse 5
"Behold, the days are coming,"declares the LORD,"When I will raise up for David a righteous Branch; And He will reign as king and act wisely And do justice and righteousness in the Land.
2007-09-04 12:25:43 · 13 answers · asked by Gilbert 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes she was of both Levi and Judah. Priest and King lineages. Jesus of course being the King and High Priest of Israel. Melchizedek. King of the Just.
Luke 1:
There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife [was] of the daughters of Aaron, and her name [was] Elisabeth.
Elisabeth her cousin, documented lineage of Aaron, Levite priesthood.
THis is also how you can document when Jesus was conceived in December and not born in december. to a real scholar though. :-) good luck.
2007-09-04 12:30:17 · answer #1 · answered by pissdownsatansback 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nothing whatever. Christians throw the word around way too much. Every good thing that's the least bit out of the ordinary they attribute to a miracle. Miracles don't happen very often (it would take the fun out of them). In fact, there's only a few places in the Bible where miracles happen in groups: 1) Creation Week 2) Moses 3) Elijah and Elisha 4) Jesus and the apostles Creation is a given. These other three were times where God was signifying a new message that He was giving to His people, and the purpose of the miracle was to validate the credentials of the messenger. What most people call a miracle is actually an act of providence. Examples in the Bible would be David defeating Goliath or Gideon defeating the Midianites--there is a perfectly rational explanation for each that in no way violates the natural laws of the universe. Miracles violate these laws (hence the term supernatural). That is why they have so much impact. That is why God doesn't just throw them around like parlor tricks for our amusement. We will not experience miracles in bulk again on this earth until just before the second coming of Christ. But that does not mean that prayers are not answered; God just chooses to work within the laws of the universe most of the time.
2016-05-21 06:16:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Virgin birth comes from the year 325 ce when the Emperor Constantine allowed the Nicea Creed to be the religion to follow...this creed influenced the Roman emperor because it went along the lines of Roman culture and that would be Roman mythology of Gods making earthly women pregnant. The original book of Matthew was never found but somehow made it into the bible with the idea of Mary becoming pregnant by God. The book of Luke says the Holy spirit overcame Mary, it doesn t say it made her pregnant. Through out the bible god has sworn to never break the promise with King David but some how this Nicea Creed made God out to be a liar and break his promise to David. People have allowed ancient Roman influence to dominate our way of thinking. Emperor Constantine was both pagan and christian, so he says, and he allowed both to blend...The Apostle Paul wrote 14 books of the bible and never once spoke of God making Mary pregnant. One last thing, Paul before he died said this in 2 Timothy 4: 3-4
2016-05-18 07:15:30 · answer #3 · answered by Shane 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order for their Jesus to be a legitimate Messiah his blood line needed to be from King David. The Christians have made every attempt to make it so. Unfortunately for them, they couldn't get their stories straight on Mary's blood line and their fabrications have clashed. The Jews have always known there was no connection and that is another reason why he was never accepted as the Messiah.
2007-09-04 12:35:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is a great question!
If you read the first chapter of Matthew you'll find your answer. The answer is about lineage. Jesus had no biological father, God chose Joseph, who was from the lineage of David to be his earthly father, and this is how Jesus got his lineage. He was of the house of his earthly father, which was the house of David, and yes, they did keep track of family lineage and/or geneaology, on both sides of a persons family in Israel. You will find genealogy all through the Bible.
2007-09-04 15:37:18 · answer #5 · answered by guts_spunk_moxie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. She came through the line of Nathan the son of David.
2007-09-04 12:38:21 · answer #6 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Look at the two lists of begats ... one in Luke and the other in Matthew. Some scholars say that Jesus came from David's line on both sides.
2007-09-04 12:33:12 · answer #7 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes they both were. See two genologies, One in Matthew 1, the other in Luke 3
2007-09-04 12:33:52 · answer #8 · answered by oldguy63 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kind David wasn't all that kind--just ask Goliath.
2007-09-04 12:30:01 · answer #9 · answered by ಠ__ಠ 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We don't know, because in Israel they only keep track of the paternal line. Mary easily could have been his blood relation through the maternal line.
2007-09-04 12:29:28 · answer #10 · answered by peacetimewarror 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋