I recently learned that Chimpanzees are so close to us, that if you matched blood types we could have a blood transfusion with each other. Yet we can't do that with others like gorillas.
So...did "god" do this so we can just use them to our benefit if need be?
(Google it, it's easy to find... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=jane+goodall+blood+transfusion )
2007-09-04 11:04:09 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Make believe, yes...just wondering what the other view thinks of it...
2007-09-04 11:11:01 · update #1
Nah, we're just related by common descent.
It's a wonderful fact that doesn't feel very comfortable to some people, because that would mean humans need to rethink their moral values in relation to other species on this planet. We aren't alone on this earth, and we never were.
2007-09-04 11:24:00 · answer #1 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The question is trivial but this is a damning insight into the Christian mindset, the belief that, on some level, if we can exploit something, God specifically created it for our exploitation.
On an even larger implication you can say that if God didn't want or intend you to do something it would be impossible.
I wonder is Hitler ever said "Maybe I'm doing something hideous and immoral here?
Nah! If God didn't want the Holocaust, he'd make Jews, gays and Gypsies less flammable."
2007-09-04 11:17:22 · answer #2 · answered by sgtcosgrove 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think of a brilliant form of the individuals who spoke back this ignored the component of the quote. "all of us could get married atleast as quickly as of their existence time, no person merits to be happy all their existence" ability in case you're married, then you certainly would be unhappy throughout the time of the marriage. i think of he's quoting the viewpoint of a cynic who's had undesirable marriages. lots are undesirable like that because of the fact many all of us is immature in relationships, and marry for the incorrect motives, yet on the comparable time, some human beings finally end up in truly stable marriages which do no longer wreck aside like that. on the turn component although, no marriage is acceptable, so all might have issues, then returned existence is the comparable (besides the reality that i do no longer have confidence this interpretation replaced into seen via the author). Assuming you're judging authentic or fake on the muse of "all of us needs to adventure something which won't be friendly yet is an element to existence" (and not no count if marriage is or isn't undesirable), then i might say the fact is authentic to an volume (I agree, yet i do no longer think of all of us could be compelled to do something, purely recommended, subsequently I disagree with using "could"). Convuluted answer i assume, yet given how Lord Bryon worded it, there are some incredibly some issues to assert. Or to paraphrase; authentic, yet i think of he's being overly cynical and has debateable premises for his argument.
2016-10-09 23:07:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution = Real
God = Make Believe
2007-09-04 11:08:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
And the first heart transplants used pig hearts...so? Evolution can NEVER have happened...the Scientific Law of Biogenesis = REAL science
2007-09-04 11:10:50 · answer #5 · answered by cbmultiplechoice 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah right, I think that's how AIDS started, messing with the monkeys.
2007-09-04 11:10:19 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋