if so who would you vote in??
2007-09-04 08:06:56 · 20 answers · asked by whymeagain13 5 in Sports ➔ Auto Racing ➔ NASCAR
No! In fact it should of remained 10 driver's as it was from the start.The only reason that they made it 12 was because Jr and Gordon missed .
However,I don't like the Chase to begin with .
2007-09-04 08:15:29 · answer #1 · answered by NasCarl #99 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I so agree with NasCarl #99. The chase in some ways is not really at a fair advantage as it is right now. 12 is too many! Even with 10 drivers I don't see it fair with the top driver giving up his point lead(look at Bush Series) to a 12th place driver that might be 1500 points behind and if he happen to have some good luck the last 10 races he deserves the championship?? NO! So no 13 drivers would be even worse in my opinion.
2007-09-04 16:10:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope.
I don't think they should have a top 12 or even a top 10. I think the Chase format is ridiculous. They need to look at their overall scoring system and find a fair way to award points throughout the season to the most consistent driver(s). Then at the end, only one will end up winning the season, not who did the best during the last 10 races.
2007-09-04 18:23:40 · answer #3 · answered by Jayme M 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO. Should the Superbowl teams be chosen by the fans or should the teams actually WIN and earn the chance to play in the big game.
Fan votes only come up when a popular driver fails to make the cut. Sorry Jr. Fans, there's always next year and the new team.
2007-09-04 15:17:34 · answer #4 · answered by mccoyblues 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No. 12 is already too many. If you can't make it into the top 12 after 26 races, then you don't deserve to be in the chase. The championship is not a popularity contest, it is a test of the best driver and team.
2007-09-04 15:40:37 · answer #5 · answered by omichels24 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well it started out with 10, now it's 12. I think they should get rid of the Chase. The King himself said the Champion is not made in 10 races,it's who raced all year to get to first. I would vote for Kenny Wallace
2007-09-04 16:59:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! I don't think they should have expanded it to 12. I think 10 was the right amount. I am glad that they awarded extra points for wins and that the wins will help to set the field for the race, but I think trying to accomodate fans of "elite" drivers by increasing the number allowed in only waters down the field. If you notice the standings, only Clint Bowyer is in the chase and has no wins. This means that the ones who win are in and not just consistency.
2007-09-04 15:19:04 · answer #7 · answered by rogn1 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No it would be to biased and unfair to other drivers, crew members, and car owners.It would just be a problem causing STINK!!!! Picture this SayNewman finished 13th in points but the fans vote in say Kyle Petty who was in 36th place in points after 26 races???????? STINK CITY!!!!
2007-09-04 16:36:37 · answer #8 · answered by Ed P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because then Gordon and Junior would be getting in because of their popularity. The chase is for the top few in points. If you vote in a person who is 25th in points, then they have very little chance of winning.
2007-09-04 15:25:43 · answer #9 · answered by theewokprincess 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, they set the rules for the game now lets stick to them. But
then again, I don't like the chase format anyway. And
besides, next year Jr. should make the chase driving for HMS
so there would be no need to change the rules again.
2007-09-04 15:19:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋