If Global Warming is not real then why do my MM's melt in my hand now? They use to melt in your mouth and not in your hand.
2007-09-04 07:40:16 · 19 answers · asked by hawk_barry 6 in Environment ➔ Global Warming
I predicted that the 2 Cat 5 hurricanes would be blamed on global warming. I just didn't realize my prediction would come true so soon.
The alarmists have decided to blame every unusual weather on global warming. So, now they have set themselves up to never be wrong. Nice.
But lets go back to 2005. After Katrina and Rita, alarmists had a consensus that GW causes more hurricanes. After the dud of a hurricane season in 2006, the alarmists all of a sudden had to change their tune. GW actually SUPPRESSES hurricanes. Now in 2007, we already have 2 cat 5 hurricanes and the alarmists will now say that GW causes more hurricanes.
Global warming is the cause of everything including M&M's melting in your hand.
2007-09-04 09:19:42 · answer #1 · answered by 5_for_fighting 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
A while back when the Tsunami happened off Indonesia and Sri Lanka got swamped along with a host of other places, Sky News put out that the earth had changed positions by 2 degrees.
SInce then nothing on the news, but the Jet Stream seems to have moved approx 400 miles south and the weather everywhere is different. Could this tilt be the cause and not global warming.
2007-09-04 08:32:54 · answer #2 · answered by YveyK 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
IT IS REAL!!!
OK, you have probably heard a lot of people say that Global Warming is just a natural cycle, and that there's nothing we can do to stop it from occurring. While there is some truth to that (Global Warming is a natural cycle, and it's going to occur no matter what) there's something else out there that's messing up this natural cycle, and is making it like nothing the world has ever seen before. That new factor is human activities. Human activities directly affect the greenhouse effect (which directly affects Global Warming), you see greenhouse gases a natural in the atmosphere to keep us from freezing over, but since the beginning of the industrial age, we (humans) have added excess greenhouse gases into the atmosphere that aren't suppose to be there (and the more we add the harder it is for the earth to remove them). These excess gases trap more heat and release less causing the whole earth to heat up (a.k.a. Global Warming) this is NOT good because the slightest change in the earth's climate systems can affect the entire thing. Causing new climate patterns to emerge that we may not be able to adapt to (and about 1/3 to 2/3 of the worlds species as well).
But there is still hope. We currently have all of the technology, money, man power, and resources we need to EFFECTIVLEY slow Global Warming back down to its modest warming over thousands of years.
To get more information, evaluate your daily impact, and to find out how you can start reducing your daily impact (cheaply) go to climatecrisis.org and/or think.mtv.com and/or nasa.gov and/ or http://liveearth.msn.com/green/myths
And if this still isn't working for you then I have a question for you. In about 30 years (if humans haven’t decide to change our ways, go green, and slow down the effects of Global Warming to its natural rate) and the effects of Global Warming have set in so far that there's nothing we can do or any one after us can do to reverse what WE have done, and my children/grandchildren and you children/grandchildren have to live with the horrible effects What are you going to say? What are you going to say when they ask you, "What were you thinking? Why didn't you do anything?"
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO SAY?
(and mealting MM's are scientific evidence that global warming is real sorry)
2007-09-04 12:19:21 · answer #3 · answered by Beacon 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
While I believe Global Warming is Fact....unfortunately, M&M's melted in my hands 45 years ago!! Therefore, while I appreciate your association between the two, I don't think M&M's are the best indicator of global warming :o)
I loved the question though!
2007-09-04 10:38:07 · answer #4 · answered by iwannabquietnow 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Global warming is a fact. Anthropogenic contribution is a fact, albeit subject to discussion as to its actual impact. Predicted future scenarios are mostly fiction, sort of like a historical fiction novel, with some fact thrown in, but largely conjecture. Proposed solutions are little better than pyramid investment schemes.
Conserve energy and resources because it's a good thing to do, not because Al Gore and Laurie David told you to at their latest concert for whatever.
2007-09-04 08:06:28 · answer #5 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
One doesn't have much to do with the other. Do you really remember m&m's not melting in your hand? The melting is due to the temperature of your palm as well as the ambient temperature. If you hand is warmer, or you remember them not melting in the winter and it is now summer, then you can't compare them.
The scientific evidence of global warming is overwhelming. Real data can be found in scientific journals, not magaizines that mainly feature celebrity gossip.
2007-09-04 07:46:53 · answer #6 · answered by J C 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Fiction. The M&Ms melt in your hand because of your body heat. Sorry but Al Gore is lying to get votes (he denys it but he is probably going to run in '08) There is no global warming. Enjoy your M&Ms.
2007-09-04 10:17:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
MM's always melt in my hand. Global warming is fact, cause it's happening right now.
2007-09-04 08:09:49 · answer #8 · answered by nondescript 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Global warming is simple observational fact. Why it exists is a theory (and a damn good one at that). It says nothing about why your M&Ms melt in your hand.
2007-09-04 08:44:00 · answer #9 · answered by SomeGuy 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
As Paris would say... you must be 'HOT'.
On a serious note, Global Warming is only starting....
A critical mass has been built...
Can anyone say two Cat 5 hurricanes, same season landfall, first time ever?
Tornados in New York?
Iceburgs the size of Connetticut?
oh.. just starting.
not 'hot'.
2007-09-04 07:54:54 · answer #10 · answered by G L 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋