English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and how the hell did people come to the conclusion that explosions create things
(big bang theory)

have you ever seen a explosion create something? hell no but i seen it destroy ****

better yet have you ever seen a monkey evolve? i highly doubt it

theres as much proof to support your theories as there is proof to support the existance of god (as you people put it)

*points at YOU and laughs*

2007-09-04 06:28:29 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

VICTORY IS MINE!!!!


PS. any answer you have in rebuttal to my question i gaurentee ill have counter-point so bring it on woman!

2007-09-04 06:29:24 · update #1

ah well ya got me there with that brain joke that was top notch and i say that with full confidence that your a complete jerk-off

2007-09-04 06:34:06 · update #2

who said the big bang was evolution genius im referring to two different things your i.q dropped the day you started listening to your parents

HAHAHA!!

2007-09-04 06:37:07 · update #3

listen people my point is your theories are flawed even the maker of those so called laws didnt even believe in that garbage after further study so why are you hanging onto something that he himself didnt even believe in

2007-09-04 06:38:37 · update #4

the fact that you think that i think evolution happens within a lifespan obviously means you either misread the question ,stupid or all of the above

2007-09-04 06:42:30 · update #5

the only possible unquestionable proof is video taped evidence HAHAHAHAHA

2007-09-04 06:43:49 · update #6

16 answers

That's because there isn't one! You right explosive do destroy.
There is no such thing as evolution "Satan clever deception" to deceive man from the truth of God.

God loves you...God bless

2007-09-04 06:39:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

Look up Transitional Fossils, we have thousands of examples and find more every year.

Your missing link excuse has be debunked for years, apparently your pastor forgot to update you.

The fact that you think evolution happens within a lifespan shows that you need a little research into the theory. It is really cool actually and a great read, if you give it a chance.

There are piles and piles and piles of fossil evidence that support evolution, once again your pastor must have forgotten to let you know that, I am starting to think that maybe he is trying to force an agenda despite what the evidence points to.

The Universe is not a nice place where nothing chaotic happens. In fact it is the complete opposite, eventually the Andromeda galaxy will collide with the Milky way, causing life in our solar system to be burned up. I wonder why God intelligently designed that occurrence?

p.s. Andromeda is the closest Galaxy to the Milky Way and is on a collision course with us. Astronomy is an awesome study as well, and could help you with your arguments.

EDIT----
"better yet have you ever seen a monkey evolve?"

Your question shows that you believe that evolution happens in a lifetime, in order to see it happen, I would have to be alive.

I am sorry that your belief makes it impossible for you to learn and grow. It must be a sad existence.

2007-09-04 13:39:32 · answer #2 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 3 0

How "un-evolved" are you looking for? Evolution is a continuous and ongoing process in response to environmental pressures. If you looking for a "less evolved corpse", would smaller satisfy you? Consider that humans were noticeable shorter than they are now as recently as 700 years ago. I find it hard to believe all the medieval clothing. armor, etc. in museums was made just for children!

Need something older? Try mummies. Again, I doubt they're all just kids.

Oh, you're looking for something more "ape-like"? Sorry, but soft tissue doesn't last very long (it decomposes), so you'll have to settle for skeletal remains. I guess you don't consider "ape-like bone and skull fragments" found together with primitive tools evidence of early humans, huh? Oh, those were just MONKEYS using tools, not early humans?

Then . . . WHY did the monkeys stop using those tools? Did the Devil make 'em quit???

2007-09-04 13:55:30 · answer #3 · answered by 222 Sexy 5 · 0 0

According to a piece I saw on Fox News several weeks ago the time it took for one 'man' to evolve into the next stage of 'man' was 239,000 generations. Yes, that is GENERATIONS.

Can you even comprehend the number is years involved in 239,000 generations? An unevolved corpse would have been what, a prehistoric ape like creature from the age of dinosaurs, right? I'll bet there is such a specimen somewhere. I am not a scientist. Obviously you are not either or you would know that creationism is complete bunk.

2007-09-04 13:40:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

???

They have found fossils of early homo sapiens, and precursers to homo sapiens. What "unevolved corpse" means is unclear, unless it means "critters that aren't quite our species, but are species from which we descended."

If it means something else, you'd have to explain what that is, and why you think they'd a) need to find them, and b) that they haven't.

"ever seen a monkey evolve" shows that you completely misunderstand what evolution says.

IF you were interested in understanding it (which I gather you aren't), you could (maybe; it takes some intellectual work to understand it correctly).

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/0_0_0/lines_01

is a starting place, which talks about the lines of evidence supporting evolution.

Given that there's TONS of evidence supporting evolution, and absolutely NONE supporting the existence of a Sky Bully, you're wrong when you say there's "as much proof" for the two views.

But then reason or truth seem to have little value to you, if you value them at all.

You seem to think that loving ignorance is a Great Thing, as loving evidence, reason, truth, and reality are somehow flawed.

I wonder why that is.

2007-09-04 16:25:42 · answer #5 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 0 0

Unevovled corpse? What are fossils?

It's hard to debate evolution with you when you don't seem to understand the basic theme. You don't see something evolve, it happens over millenia. Animals that have traits that allow them to survive effectively in their envirnonment reproduce while those that do not die off. Heredity passes those traits down to the next generation. Over time, animals change. They lose hair. The become taller. They stand upright. Apes (I think you're incorrectly using the term monkey) are closely related to humans. It is believed that these species evovled from a common ancestor because different traits were genetically passed down to descendants in different geographical locations. Over thousands of years, apes and humans became very different animals.

2007-09-04 13:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by amancalledj 4 · 2 0

You're causing my i.q. to drop.

Every living thing is derived from the process of evolution and subject to natural selection, so "unevolved corpse" is an oxymoron.

Evolution occurs over millions and billions of years. It's confirmed by genetic similarities between different species (evolution by common descent) and fossil evidence. Have you ever seen Jehovah stick something together out of clay?
What kind of clay did he use?

The Big Bang is not evolution, and they should not be confused.

The Medieval village called. They want their idiot back.

2007-09-04 13:34:07 · answer #7 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 8 0

a) we call it the fossil record; there is no such thing as a "unevolved corpse".
b) calling the big bang an explosion is an enormous misconception. Maybe you should try learning about something before looking like a @ss on the internet
c) the god hypothesis has no evidence going for it, scientific theories by definition have a lot going for them.

2007-09-04 13:40:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

There is no evidence to support the existence of god

evolution is a fact - there is so much evidence and you can observe it for yourself by watching quick reproduction creatures like small flys.

If you want to believe in stone age Jewish myths so be it - but leave the rest of the sane world to understand the truth.

2007-09-04 13:51:40 · answer #9 · answered by Freethinking Liberal 7 · 3 1

You may have actually succeeded in reducing the overall IQ of R&S by a few points.

Congrats. Idiot.

2007-09-04 14:58:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hi Legalize-it
I don't see that anyone can answer your question satisfactorily as you have obviously closed your mind to knowledge.
It may be better for you to go back to your cave instead of bothering people in the real world.
Cheers
An atheist

2007-09-04 13:49:10 · answer #11 · answered by Grotty Bodkin is not dead!!! 5 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers