Do closed borders fit with Bush's New One World Government?

Question

If you are against open borders you may as well be against something like a teenage boy kissing a teenage girl.

Answer 1

Well it really doesn't make any difference does it?
Bush is gone in a year and a half!
The American People do not want a "one world govt."
There are about 250 million firearms in the hands of citizens in the U.S. to prevent just such an occurance.
And any politician even proposing such nonsense would probably be shot down in the street.

Answer 2

No, which is why Bush is under SPP giving military training and equipment to Mexico 'for the drug trade'. SPP is all about a border around the THREE countries with mobility within that three country border. McCain immediately jumped on the band wagon and said this would 'secure OUR border' (which to the extent it stops cartels may be true), however, they are not worried about our border, but Mexico's southern one, and criminal elements, only. That is no palliative to the overstretched resources resulting from above quota immigration of those too poor to cover their services in taxes, who put extra burden on our schools due to language barriers.

Answer 3

Bush likes open borders because they support his idea of a one world government.

Answer 4

Dubya wants open borders, more specific Dubya wants the North American Union which is another one of his secret plans.

The NAFTA Superhighway

When completed, the highway will run from Mexico City to Toronto, slicing through the heartland like a dagger sunk into a heifer at the loins and pulled clean to the throat. It will be four football fields wide, an expansive gully of concrete, noise and exhaust, swelled with cars, trucks, trains and pipelines carrying water, wires and God knows what else. Through towns large and small it will run, plowing under family farms, subdevelopments, acres of wilderness. Equipped with high-tech electronic customs monitors, freight from China, offloaded into nonunionized Mexican ports, will travel north, crossing the border with nary a speed bump, bound for Kansas City, where the cheap goods manufactured in booming Far East factories will embark on the final leg of their journey into the nation's Wal-Marts.

And this NAFTA Superhighway, as it is called, is just the beginning, the first stage of a long, silent coup aimed at supplanting the sovereign United States with a multinational North American Union.

Even as this plot unfolds in slow motion, the mainstream media are silent (not Lou Dobbs); politicians are in denial. Yet word is getting out. Like samizdat, info about the highway has circulated in niche media platforms old and new, on right-wing websites like WorldNetDaily, in the pages of low-circulation magazines like the John Birch Society's The New American and increasingly on the letters to the editor page of local newspapers.

"Construction of the NAFTA highway from Laredo, Texas to Canada is now underway," read a letter in the February 13 San Gabriel Valley Tribune. "Spain will own most of the toll roads that connect to the superhighway. Mexico will own and operate the Kansas City Smart Port. And NAFTA tribunal, not the U.S. Supreme Court, will have the final word in trade disputes. Will the last person please take down the flag?" There are many more where that came from. "The superhighway has the potential to cripple the West Coast economy, as well as posing an enormous security breach at our border," read a letter from the January 7 San Francisco Chronicle. "So far, there has been no public participation or debate on this important issue. Public participation and debate must begin now."

In some senses it has. Prompted by angry phone calls and e-mail from their constituents, local legislators are beginning to take action. In February the Montana state legislature voted 95 to 5 for a resolution opposing "the North American Free Trade Agreement Superhighway System" as well as "any effort to implement a tri-national political, government entity among the United States, Canada, and Mexico." Similar resolutions have been introduced in eighteen other states as well as the House of Representatives, where H. Con Res. 40 has attracted, as of this writing, twenty-seven co-sponsors. Republican presidential candidates in Iowa and New Hampshire now routinely face hostile questions about the highway at candidate forums. Citing a spokesperson for the Romney campaign, the Concord Monitor reports that "the road comes up at town meetings second only to immigration policy.

Answer 5

Hardly..... Every notice how the worlds ultimate super power can't seem to close its borders? If the President wanted our borders closed they would be.

Answer 6

No closed borders do not fit in with NWO or NAU whichever you want to call it.

But things like this do.
http://www.halliburton.com/default/main/halliburton/eng/news/source_files/news.jsp?newsurl=/default/main/halliburton/eng/news/source_files/press_release/2007/esgnws_031907.html

Evidently you need to click on the 2007 at the right and scroll down to April 19 I believe for the story on Mexico.

March 19 I'm sorry

Answer 7

Jorge Bush want one big country and, HE'S AN IDIOT! He cares about Mexico, not America!

CLOSE THE BORDERS! DEPORT ALL ILLEGALS! ENFORCE OUR LAWS! JAIL EMPLOYERS THAT HIRE THE ILLEGAL!