English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I asked atheist how did life begin as we know it, and someone answered a molecule,but if a single molecule, how do you explain this single molecule producing all the different living things?

2007-09-03 20:09:01 · 21 answers · asked by Richie Spice 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

you'd think what ever is produced would be identical.

2007-09-03 20:10:12 · update #1

diane- i don't know how to link, but i asked the question one day ago under richie spice

2007-09-03 20:41:31 · update #2

21 answers

Good question.....
For those who believed in darwinism please see following site:

www.harunyahya.com

Once Khalifa Haroon Rasheed asked Imam Malik: "What is the evidence (daleel) pointing to the existence of Allah (subhanahu wa ta`ala)?" Imam Malik replied: "Difference in languages, difference in pitches of voice, difference in singing are proof that Allah (subhanahu wa ta`ala) exists!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The same question was asked, by an atheist, of Imam Abu Hanifa and he replied, "Forget it! At the moment, I am busy thinking about this ship. People tell me there is a big ship, it contains different goods on board. There is no one to steer it, no one maintaining it. Yet, this ship keeps going back and forth; it even traverses big waves on the oceans; it stops at the locations that it is supposed to stop at; it continues in the direction that it is supposed to head. This ship has no captain and no one planning its trips."

The atheist who posed the question interrupted and exclaimed, "What kind of strange and silly thought is this? How can any intelligent person think that some thing like this can occur?"

Imam Abu Hanifa said, "I feel sorry about your state! You cannot imagine one ship running without some one looking after its affairs. Yet you think that for this whole world, which runs exactly and precisely, there is no one who looks after it, and no one owns it."

Hearing the reply, the atheist was left speechless but he found out more about Haqq (The Truth) and proclaimed Islam.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Imam Shafi`i replied to the question in the following way, "The leaves of Toot (berries) are all but one. Each leaf tastes exactly the same. Insects, honey bees, cows, goats, and deer live off of it. After eating these the insects produce silk; bees produce honey; deer give musk (a special kind of scent), cows and goats deliver off-springs. Is this not clear evidence that one kind of leaf has so many qualities, and who created these qualities? It is the Khaliq (Creator) who we call Allah (subhanahu wa ta`ala) Who is the Inventor and the Creator."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal reflected on the question in the following way. He said, "There is an incredibly strong fort, it has no doors, there is no way to get in. In fact, there is not even a hole in it. From outside it glows like the moon and from inside it shimmers like gold. It is sealed from all sides, matter of fact it is air tight. Suddenly one of its doors breaks down, a living thing with eyes and ears, a beautiful looking animal appears yelling and wandering all over. So is not there a creator who made it possible for life to take place in this secured and closed fort? And is not this Creator better than humans? This Creator has no limit." Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal was referring to an egg which is closed from all sides but Allah (subhanahu wa ta`ala) The Khaliq (Creator) puts life in it and a chick pops out.

2007-09-03 20:28:01 · answer #1 · answered by Faisal F 4 · 1 3

Posting a science question in the religion and spirituality section often means the asker does not really want an answer. His goal is to ask a question that he believes proves some scientific knowledge to be wrong, or that science does not yet answer, and make the implicit claim that the only other explanation is a god, and specifically, the same god he happens to believe in.

It's the "god of the gaps" - intellectually bankrupt, since it favors ignorance instead of knowledge, and because of the contained logical fallacy.

However, on the off chance that you really want to know the answer:

It's called evolution. Look it up.
And theists are allowed to learn about it too.


Here, these sites will provide good starting points:

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/
http://www.talkorigins.org/

2007-09-03 20:18:08 · answer #2 · answered by Dreamstuff Entity 6 · 9 1

I am a 49 year old Wiccan witch and we believe in four Gods. Gods that even a Blind man could see. #1. Mother Earth #2. Water #3. Fire #4. Air With out any one of these we could NOT survive on this world.

2016-05-21 00:03:38 · answer #3 · answered by mira 3 · 0 0

The theory of a common ancestor between all organisms is one of the principles of evolution. The species diverged due to natural selection and and random variation.

2007-09-03 20:27:23 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 3 0

Evolution describes how species evolve through the process of natural selection. It cannot answer the question of the origin of life. Study the science and stop listening to ignorant people.

.

2007-09-03 20:18:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

God's non-existence is evidenced by the fact that religion says that he is almighty but he doesn't have the power to show up, not even on 9/11. Religion always tries to create a diversion to this fact. Nice try anyhow.

2007-09-03 20:19:09 · answer #6 · answered by liberty11235 6 · 2 1

Well, if it's the DNA molecule, then that explains it. Also agrees with experiment, but this requires that you develop faith in microscopes and stuff.

2007-09-03 20:21:38 · answer #7 · answered by The Instigator 5 · 2 0

I don't see why you lot have to choose between evolution and creationism. I think Darwin was a very bright fellow and I still consider myself a Christian (my father's an archdeacon, I'm ordained and my younger brother's a deacon too)... why can't science, logic, and Christianity just get on, for goodness sake?!

2007-09-03 20:18:27 · answer #8 · answered by ǝןqɐʇdǝɔɔɐun ʎןןɐıɔos 5 · 4 1

A. It was asexual
B. One single celled organism went one way, and adapted to fit that environment, and another went the other way, evolving differently because of the environment they lived in.

2007-09-03 20:18:30 · answer #9 · answered by Tanjo22 3 · 2 1

Do Buddhists believe in a creator god?

No, we do not. There are several logical reasons for this. The Buddha, like modern scientists, sociologists and psychologists, believed that religious ideas and especially the god idea have their origins in fear. The Buddha says:

"Gripped by fear men go to sacred mountains, sacred groves, sacred trees and shrines." *Dhammpada 188

Primitive man found himself in a dangerous and hostile world, the fear of wild animals, of not being able to find enough food, of injury or disease, and of natural phenomena like thunder, lightning and volcanoes was constantly with him. Finding no security, he created the idea of god in order to give him comfort in good times, courage in times of danger and consolation when things went wrong. To this day, you will notice that people become more religious at times of crises, you will hear them say that the belief in a god gives them the strength they need to deal with life. You will hear them explain that they believe in god because they prayed in time of need and their prayer was answered. All this seems to support the Buddha’s teaching that the god-idea is a response to fear and frustration. The Buddha taught us to try to understand our fears, to lessen our desires and to calmly and courageously accept the things we cannot change. He replaced fear, not with irrational belief but with rational understanding.

The second reason the Buddha did not believe in a creator god is because there does not seem to be any evidence to support this idea. There are numerous religions, all claiming that they alone have god’s words preserved in their holy book, that they alone understand god’s nature, that their god exists and that the gods of other religions do not. Some claim that god is masculine, some that she is feminine and others that it is neuter. They are all satisfied that there is ample evidence to prove the existence of their god but they laugh in disbelief at the evidence other religions use to prove the existence of another god. It is not surprising that with so many different religions spending so many centuries trying to prove the existence of their gods that still no real, concrete, substantial or irrefutable evidence has been found. Buddhists suspend judgement until such evidence is forthcoming.

The third reason the Buddha did not believe in a creator god is that the belief is not necessary. Some claim that the belief in a god is necessary in order to explain the origin of the universe. But this is not so. Science has very convincingly explained how the universe came into being without having to introduce the god-idea. Some claim that belief in god is necessary to have a happy, meaningful life. Again we can see that this is not so. There are millions of Atheists, free-thinkers and Buddhists, who live useful, happy and meaningful lives without belief in a creator god. Some claim that belief in god’s power is necessary because humans, being weak, do not have the strength to help themselves. Once again, the evidence indicates the opposite. One often hears of people who have overcome great disabilities and handicaps, enormous odds and difficulties through their own inner resources, through their own efforts and without belief in a god. Some claim that god is necessary in order to give man salvation. But this argument only holds good if you accept the theological concept of salvation and Buddhists do not accept such a concept. Based on his own experience, the Buddha saw that each human being had the capacity to purify the mind, develop infinite love and compassion and perfect understanding. He shifted attention from the heavens to the heart and encouraged us to find solutions to our problems through self-understanding.

But if there is no creator god how did the universe get here?

All religions have myths and stories which attempt to answer this question. In ancient times, when man simply did not know, such myths were adequate, but in the 20th century, in the age of physics, astronomy and geology, such myths have been superseded by scientific fact. Science has explained the origin of the universe without recourse to the god-idea.

2007-09-04 05:49:44 · answer #10 · answered by Thomas 6 · 1 0

Because the magical puddle from which all life sprang had many orifices, and they formed out of proto orifices, and life all left the magical puddle that Atheists call, "Mommy", and ran a muck. After they rescued themselves from the muck, they began to read Dawkins and started game shows on TV. That's why Atheists come to the R&S section, to remember "Mommy".

2007-09-03 20:25:37 · answer #11 · answered by Christian Sinner 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers