Whatever your answer, please state the reason for your answer and your religion (if any.)
2007-09-03 16:04:00 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I was taught and brought up it was wrong in the Catholic church because it was supposed to be holy bond of sex after marriage especially blessed by God.
But you know what when you are 40 and a virgin and waiting for the right guy, and you spent hell on earth with lust, unrequited sex, and love, it is NOT worth it waiting for the right man because he will NOT come, so what then. I would not tell my children to wait because you will go nuts nerve-wise, and pscyhologically- wise if you don't have sex.
One does need it an outlet because it is normal.
Please don't give a negative, because if YOU haven't gone through what I did, then don't comment at all.
I you are a virgin let's say at 25 and get married that is o.k. you are still young and hot, but what happens if you wait til 40 like me---joke!
2007-09-03 16:20:16 · answer #1 · answered by Born Valentine's Day 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i am completely FOR sex before marriage....you may be compatible in virtually everything, but come to have sex on your wedding night and your needs and wants may be totally different. sex is very important to a marriage/relationship - it would make things harder for both partners if you the were unhappy with your love life. Not to mention you're missing out on a lot of intense love, pleasure and general good times! By intense love i mean that between a loving couple making love is the ultimate in sharing love. I'm genuinely interested in why you think it is wrong..... I dont want to offend in anyway, but in my experience of aquaintences who are christians i can't help but feel that their religion can sometimes get in the way of truly enjoying some aspects of life.
2016-05-20 23:07:06 · answer #2 · answered by berniece 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do believe that sex before marriage is wrong, simply because the Bible does preach against it AND in the long run it helps avoid ALOT of STDs and unwanted pregnacies. I'm pentecostal. But if someone had have sexual relations before,it's okay, just try to stay pure from now on. IMO
2007-09-03 17:10:07 · answer #3 · answered by LoveeLoveGrl 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-09-04 01:50:29 · answer #4 · answered by I give you the Glory Father ! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I do not believe it is wrong. Although being married before you get pragnant makes things alot more secure. If you are married before you get pranant there is less of a chance the guy well run on you, there is less of a chance that you got an STD from him and are passing it on to your child, there is more of a chance that you are financialy stable enough to be able to afford a child ...
I do not think sex before marrage is wrong but I do advise that people be married before they have get pragnant.
2007-09-03 16:20:20 · answer #5 · answered by mari_aset 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes.
I'm speaking from experience. I believe it is wrong because I know the value of waiting until you are married. There's nothing like finding "the one," marrying them, giving yourself to them and them doing the same for you. There's nothing like having someone be your "one and only" and/or you being theirs. (One is great but both are really awesome!) It brings a couple great joy and closeness. It's such a priceless gift. But if you don't wait you lose that gift. You also take it away from the other person, your future spouse, and their future spouse.
Of course, God said that before I did. It is in the Bible and it's in there for good reason. The way I see it, God gives that gift and He knows about it better than anyone else. He wants us to be happy and enjoy the best. He knows that by not waiting, we ruin something so special and it often leads to all kinds of other problems as well. God gives us commands not to punish or repress us, but because He loves us and wants the best for us (in more ways than one). So we would be wise to just listen to Him and follow His ways. We may not understand everything, but He does, and we can be assured that His way is always the best for us.
Oh, and I don't follow a religion. I follow Jesus.
2007-09-03 16:19:15 · answer #6 · answered by Consuming Fire 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
There is a limit to how much pleasure a human body can give you or to your partner. Save it for a special, committed relationship in a marriage.
Love and sex are things that have to reveal their secrets slowly, otherwise they both lose their charm. You'll keep trying different partners to have more fun, but you'll never be totally satisfied because there will be nothing left for you to discover!
The value of ANYTHING in this world is dependent on its rarity and demand. If love and sex are easily available, they lose their value. That's why we think that prostitutes are "cheap."
Once you have lowered yourself, it's difficult to regain self-respect. For example, if BMW starts selling its cars dirt cheap and later on try to increase its prices to what it's today, it would be impossible. Once something or person's value has gone down, that reputation cannot be restored.
I am a Muslim.
2007-09-03 16:16:26 · answer #7 · answered by Sincere-Advisor 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋
Marriage is honorable among all, and the bed undefiled; but fornicators and adulterers God will judge. Hebrews 13:4 (New King James Version)
I am nondenominational
2007-09-03 16:12:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, I think people should have sex before they get married to be sure they are comfortable with each other sexually and able to perform. Let's not kid ourselves. Sex is an essential part of romantic relationships. If a woman waited until marriage, I know she'd be very disappointed on her honeymoon if she discovered her new husband had erectile dysfunction.
2007-09-03 16:20:52 · answer #9 · answered by Subconsciousless 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
wrong before marriage, no.
sex before love and trust (and responsibility) is frowned upon by me, simply because the consequences are too great.]
i'm atheist.
2007-09-03 16:54:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋