simple traffic case - please advise?

Question

I was involved in a traffic accident where I have to prove that I was not going in the "wrong lane". At this stage, its the other driver's word against mine. The insurance Co. is in arbitration on the case still. I have an ariel view of the scene, but don't kno wjust how to argue my point without witnesses. I am in this situation due to the other driver (after 5hr wait and since no injuries left, she couldn't due to her car imobile) told them her cute version of the story. I do have 911 tapes showing that we were there for 5hrs. Help

Answer 1

A camera would have been nice. There should have been evidence on the road as far as an impact point. Without any proof, it's your word against the other driver.

Answer 2

We are obviously missing a lot of information here. First of all, I can hardly imagine a highway accident with a car immobilised that can be called a simple case. Then, it could be useful to know how exactly did you crash into each other.

1)Was somebody switching between lanes? What lane were you in? Where was her car moving from and in which direction? If you were in your lane and she was the one changing it could be easier for you to prove your version. In this case you should draw up a scheme of what happenned and give detailed explanations of what you have seen and heard during the crash. You might as well want to hire an independent expert to analyse the damage that both cars recieved in the crash and find grounds in favour of your version.

2)Arial view - are there any tyre tracks left on the road when any of you hit the brakes? This could be useful evidence. Can you see debris lying around? If yes, how far do the debris stretch? What was your speed at the time the accident happenned? This can prove the information regarding your speed at the moment of the crash.

3)Damage analysis - is there any typical damage to your or her car that can prove your version without expertise?

4)Provide the police with clear evidence and written proof of your reason to leave the scene (say, a written notice of your employer saying that you had to be in the office at this exact time and that you've actually arrived there, or any other possible notification).

Sorry again, but It's pretty hard to tell you in detail of what you could use as evidence, but we might as well give it a try if you provide some more information.

Answer 3

the ordinary answer is this is an infraction, which isn't even a misdemeaonr, or in different words, violating maximum site visitors rules, apart from issues like driving drunk or on an identical time as not approved, isn't a criminal offense in any respect and Miranda and all the different courtroom protections like the main suitable to a criminal specialist in basic terms applies to crimes. on an identical time as you should finally end up in detention center finally, it may in basic terms be because of the fact you commited a criminal offense concerning the value ticket. this is a criminal offense to not look at a site visitors listening to, yet cops do not could desire to provide you a Miranda warning previously you even commit a criminal offense.

Answer 4

Basically the police report is going to tell the story; and there isn't much you can do to object if your insurance company is handling the settlement - unless that settlment goes over your insurance limits and into your pocket.

Answer 5

next time take photos of the scene-try to get the names/numbers of any witnesses. Old cops "tell" generally at the point of impact there will be small piles of dirt, sand, rust, knocked lose from the underside of the vehicle.

Answer 6

Challenge the other driver to take a lie detector test.

Answer 7

It will probably end up a he said she said kind of thing. I don't think there's much you can do about it. Chalk it up to a bad experience and lesson learned (if indeed you did learn anything). Good luck!

Answer 8

Tell them to you let you explain your story using the visual and get the other person to explain it using your visual.