no, my mom had me when she was 42
i am now 12 and i have 11 brothers and sisters
45 is acutally a good age to have a ten year old because you are probably very mature and resonsible
2007-09-03 09:15:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by robster60 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
I'm 45 next month and my twins will be 11 in March. I think you'll find by looking around that most women start to have their first Child around 30. Having a 10 year old when you are 45 is quite common.
2007-09-03 09:16:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by swiss girl 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
it depends on how you look at it. there are a lot of people out there now who are having babies at that age so they will be 55 when their child is 10 so in that respect-no its not old but when you think there are also a lot of 25yr olds having babies, they will be 35 when the child is 10 and so in that respect some may say yes it is old. I dont think age is as big a problem in parenting as it used to be as people are living longer and so the implications of having children in later life arent really that bad.
in my personal opinion though, no you're not old if you are 45 and have a 10 yr old child.
2007-09-03 09:21:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by angelcakes 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
So you had her at 35. Most women give birth younger but it it becoming so common to wait until your career and life for that matter, is on the path you want before making babies. Graduating high school, college, getting married and finding your chosen profession instead of a job, all takes time and accomplishing it all before giving birth is a good thing. You set a really good example for her to follow. The only thing is, you have to keep yourself in good health so that when she gives you grandkids, you will be healthy enough to toss around a ball with them whereas if you were a tad bit younger when giving birth, those chances would be better.
2007-09-03 09:19:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by natashaizasassy1 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, I had my daughter at the age of 34 and I am going to have another one. I told my husband if he wants another baby he better tighten up because the baby makin' factory will be shuttin' down when I hit 36 which is 7 months away .I don't wont any high risk pregnancies if I can help it. Plus I can already feel arthritis trying to set in my hips and back,lol =).
2007-09-03 09:21:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by blessed1 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, not at all. Both my grandmothers had their last children in their mid-40's, so having a ten year old daughter at 45 is ten years ahead of them. They both stayed young in spirit their whole lives. Having children around keeps a person young.
2007-09-03 09:17:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by missmuffin 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not at all. 45 would be old to be having your first baby, yes, but not to have a ten year old daughter. What does age matter, as long as all is well?
2007-09-03 09:14:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Balaboo 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
ever hear the new phrase " todays 30 year old is yesterdays 40 year old"? Most people act and live like they are younger nowadays so 45 is young.
2007-09-04 09:39:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Molly 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. It is older than if the parent was 22. My grandmother was 52 when she had a newborn. So, she would have been 62 when my uncle was 10.
2007-09-03 09:16:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by CarbonDated 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No, in this day and time people are waiting to have children.
We live longer now. If anything I think having children later helps to keep you younger. You will be more fit (from chasing them) and your mind is more active (from answering all there questions). I think you will be young for a long time...you still have dating and driving to go through.
2007-09-03 09:21:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋