I was planning to buy The Sony Bravia HDTV, it has 1980x1080p..ok good...8ms..good but has a contrast ratio of ONLY 1300:1 and it is 9999Dhs which is almost $2700...I mean what the hell....So pricey and look at the contrast ratio...I aint buying this TV....I'm going with Samsung
2007-09-03 00:46:51 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Consumer Electronics ➔ TVs
yes the question is that is Samsung a better choice than Sony because I am only going to buy it for PS3...
2007-09-03 01:04:25 · update #1
Amair: Well, then, congratulations on your decision, even if it isn't a good one! Now, do you have a question?
Additional Details: Go with the Sony, no baloney. Quality, reliability and service win every time. If you want "cheaper," look at the Panasonic LCDs.
2007-09-03 01:00:15 · answer #1 · answered by AWolf 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The fact is that contrast ratio means almost nothing. Different companies use different methods of determining their contrast ratio and thus it is a flawed and unusable spec to go by. Both Sony and Samsung make great LCDs above 32". My advice is to stop looking at specs when looking at tvs like a Bravia, and start looking at them next to the other TVs you're considering. In the end your not looking at the specifications, you're looking at the picture.
2007-09-03 09:48:36 · answer #2 · answered by quikdash6 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why buy at all with news, weather, sports, instant movies and more on the web why bother with a disgracefully expensive tv.
when my recently purchased analog set can no longer receive
anything i will junk it but the unreliable signals [during storms] and commercials that are longer than the show you wanted to watch WILL NOT BE MISSED so let the tv industry slit their own throats,good riddance.
p.s. your additional details provides a legit excuse for one, too bad you can't buy just a monitor
2007-09-03 08:10:53 · answer #3 · answered by hobbabob 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋