I think some people would say "how dare we take away their rights to protest in public places and attend schools, etc" but I think it would be better to have control over the situation in order to prevent further deaths. Me, I think I can sit at home and read a book or something if I had to instead of go wandering around and get blown up. What do you think?
2007-09-02 13:25:14 · 5 answers · asked by eldude 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. " - Benjamin Franklin
2007-09-03 07:03:18 · answer #1 · answered by Jim K 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not the Iraqis. They aren't like the whining losers over here who can't bear to part with their bottled water before a flight.
2007-09-02 13:43:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know this whole problem could have been solved if we had established martial law. But we know the liberals and antiwar haters would then say we are no better then Saddam, etc.
2007-09-02 13:36:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would put them back in the same situation they had under Saddam. So what would have been the point of all the bloodshed.
2007-09-02 19:00:43 · answer #4 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i dont even know why we are being nice to them, they statred it, i say keep bombing.... sorry but thats the truth
2007-09-02 13:44:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋