Atheism the logical choice?

Question

You cant prove the non existence of a creator

Just like the believers who cannot prove the existence of a creator.

So whats so logical about atheism?

Answer 1

Google "Burden of proof".
Read carefully.
Never post this foolishness again.

Answer 2

logic? If something is created, logic says there's a writer. The regulation of Causalities says that each and each effect has a reason. this is the inspiration of technology. and this is Logical. the vast Bang has very almost all human beings with a Logical strategies on board. That reported in case you circulate each and all the earlier to the 2d previously the vast bang. the final reason of each thing that follows is Logically, What? I logicaly end that "something which could exist exterior of Time" brought about it. What "that" is desires greater logical debate than we've area for. You look into it and settle on. besides the undeniable fact that, Atheism is a decision that takes "faith" not logic. You desire that there is not any God. a minimum of not a Christian God. because of the fact IF there is. And IF we've a soul. Then we've a effect. a minimum of that's what logic tells me.

Answer 3

Ok, good question. The reason so many people are becomgin atheists is because religion in general contradicts what science is discovering. For example, there is ample evidence that evolution exists, but according to most Christians, god created man from dirt and created women from a rib bone (sounds really reasonable, right). Another reason is because of the violence and hatred that religion portrays. Christians are against gays and atheists simply because the bible says so. So that draws people away from Christianity.

Answer 4

You can't disprove the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. There "may" be a teapot orbiting Pluto; but that doesn't mean that it's likely. Etc etc.

It really is agnosticism FTW, because the position "I simply don't know" is unassailable. It's honest, and you can't fight with it. But it's NOT true to say that theism is just as rational as atheism. Theism depends, ultimately, on "faith," and faith is irrational by definition. The idea that God's son had to incarnate in the body of a Jewish carpenter and allow himself to be crucified so that his blood could vicariously atone for your soul, is not rational.

I'm not saying that there's no value in religion - even I, as an atheist, agree that there is. It's simply not a matter of logic. Atheism IS the logical choice...lol.

Answer 5

well..... logically, you do not believe whatever cannot be proven.

Isn't that logical enough? What is the logic behind believing something that cannot be proven?

What is the logic behind believing Jesus Christ instead of Krisha? What is the logic of not believe both the Bible god and Krisha? What is the logic of if you believe both you will go to hell as the bible god say there should be no god before him? What if the bible is wrong and the Hindu Scriptures are right?

Now tell me about logic.

--------------------


The fact Joan of Arc died for what she believed in commendable, but it is her, to many, she is stupid to die at the age of 19 because she wasted her life away fight for France against the English, both Christian countries, if I should say so myself.

What is so commendable about the Pope who justify religious war because of his own faith?

Superstition is only applicable if you believed in something and not disbelieve in something.

Definition of Superstition :

1. a belief or notion, not based on reason or knowledge, in or of the ominous significance of a particular thing, circumstance, occurrence, proceeding, or the like.
2. a system or collection of such beliefs.
3. a custom or act based on such a belief.
4. irrational fear of what is unknown or mysterious, esp. in connection with religion.
5. any blindly accepted belief or notion.

So kabduk, which part of Superstition you do NOT understand?

Answer 6

There really is no way to prove that God exists, or doesn't exist, as you said. However, I can't personally believe in things that fall outside the realm of reality, as Christianity does.

If God existed, he'd be outside the realm of reality; that doesn't mean he wouldn't be real. I personally find it more logical to not believe in the supernatural than TO believe in the supernatural.

That doesn't make me right however.

Answer 7

You cannot prove the non-existence of unicorns or the Tooth Fairy either,... yet I assume you, logically, do not believe in these?
You can find proof to support evolution and the big bang. These do not require the existence of a creator.

Logic.

Answer 8

If there is no evidence of flying space monkeys you don't believe in them until you are proven wrong. Thats logical.

Answer 9

well your talking about agnostic deism really to say there could have been a creator and if there was he sure don't give a flying **** about us.

why is it logical, well because at what point to we say god magiced us from a pile of dirt? we say something far more plausable, we take scientific evidence and finding review it and come to a logical conculsion

Answer 10

I am an agnostic.
Atheists boil everything down to reason through science. Their is no scientific knowledge that points to any such creator. So they have better reason to think the universe is a godless one.

Answer 11

no because believing in something is better than believing in nothing at all. Joan of Arc once gave a quote while at the stake of her death and she stated that not believing in anything is has more damnation than someone who believes strongly in their beliefs. something like that and sorry if its way off but you get the point hopefully.