English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or maybe three?

I've been listening to the church folks, and I have to agree: one big bang is not enough.

As for god himself, who's to say he too was not created by a larger more formidable god?

(Yes, that's where I differ with the church folks, but they may yet come around to this other way of thinking.)

I've even heard the suggestion that the bigger god may also have been created by a still bigger and still more formidable god.

This is all very exciting !
What say you, kind people of the Yahoo Answers?

2007-09-02 04:47:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

Red Shift is evidence of a Big Bang.

2007-09-02 04:53:39 · answer #1 · answered by The Return Of Sexy Thor 5 · 1 0

you can believe whatever you want, especially it feels exciting.

Although the Big Bang theory has become a standard explanation for explaining the origins of the universe, it is flawed. Also it cannot be explained by "Red Shift" which refers to what "things" look like at the border of the observable universe. They seem to be dissolving or going away but their constituent elements might in fact be recycling themselves. This at least is the view of the astronomer and cosmologist John Dobson. The universe may not have had a beginning.

Although certain esotericists have posited a hierarchy of universes or planes ruled by a God, these are just thoughts. The thought that Dobson and myself ascribe to (which, with some variation, is a concept within nondualistic Vedanta and Kashmir Shaivism) is that there is a self-existent, apriori ground reality (nondualists idea of "God") out of which phenomological existence occurs as projection or reflex. It did not have a beginning. The argument is that something cannot come out of nothing.

2007-09-02 05:25:48 · answer #2 · answered by philosophyangel 7 · 0 0

It's possible there may have been multiple big bangs. My wild guess is multiple big bangs would result in multiple universes, not multiple BBs contributing to our single universe. Keep in mind, around 80 years ago or so, man thought that only the Milky Way galaxy was all there is to it out there. Then with more powerful telescopes, it was realized there were other galaxies out there. Perhaps in the future, there may be a realization that our own univers is not the only one

heck, another theory is that we may really be Martians and not earthlings. It's a stretch, but possible!

2007-09-05 08:56:14 · answer #3 · answered by ackmondual 3 · 0 0

The big bang just provided the basic building blocks of the universe not the universe itself. It was later as the gas and floating debris came together under the force of gravity, forming first stars then planets that the universe came to be. A process that is still underway in places like the Egeal Head Nebula, where stars are being born.

2007-09-02 05:17:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Read Michio Kaku, theoretical physicist, he says there could have been, and still are happening, countless big bangs, resulting in an ever expanding multi-verse.

2007-09-02 04:59:47 · answer #5 · answered by Diane 4 · 1 0

now the science come to know about big bang theory but qur'ran have said it 1400 years ago
who can tell this
of'course the creator almighty allah
think about it.

2007-09-02 05:10:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

There were four big bangs and one big whoosh, but we don't know all the details yet.

2007-09-04 03:29:31 · answer #7 · answered by 2.71828182845904 5 · 0 0

Take it easy man..Every day is a big bang in our life..

2007-09-02 04:54:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Does anybody besides me like french beans?

2007-09-02 05:48:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ahhhhh... the Bang-Bang theory!

lol

2007-09-02 06:50:20 · answer #10 · answered by xx. 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers