I like that.
It reminds me of something ancient.
Like an abandoned vine-covered temple in the jungles of Bengal.
2007-09-01 18:49:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shinigami 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't agree (as much as I like Lewis's writings). It has never been shown that a soul can exist without a body as its vessel. It seems implied that a body (and a mind associated with that body) must first be in existence for a soul to be present. Just my opinion, though.
2007-09-02 01:52:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by the_way_of_the_turtle 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
And a very C.S. Lewis quote it is. Smart man he was.
2007-09-02 01:52:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by SDW 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
2007-09-02 01:54:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by djmantx 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is almost similar to the excerpt from Hindu religious book "Bhagvad Geeta", where lord says - "You are atman (soul) and it uses body as its Clothes".
Truth!
2007-09-02 02:14:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmm....never thought of it that way before.
It actually makes sense. The body is temporary. The soul is permanent.
I like it.
2007-09-02 02:01:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jim K 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Or as spiritualists say:
we're not humans having a spirit experience, we're spirits having a human experience
2007-09-02 08:25:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Stuart A B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two big ole thumbs up!
2007-09-02 01:52:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Cool!
I love it!
2007-09-02 01:50:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by batgirl2good 7
·
0⤊
0⤋