Would you leave a country and leave your child behind? I can not even imagine this.
2007-09-01 02:51:46 · 12 answers · asked by getrdone 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
She didn't take her son with her because she is using him as an anchor baby so she has a reason to sneak back across the border, and lo and behold she wants to become an ambassador for Mexico, LOL, she should be prosecuted for child endangerment if she shows face in the US "AGAIN".
2007-09-01 03:03:04 · answer #1 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me. It was a political ploy to get more media attention and she is Back in Chicago, according to Glenn Beck. Did you know that some law firms are helping businesses get around the law and legally Not hire Americans on purpose? They can't touch her because of those loopholes. Federal funds should be witheld from the City of Chicago as a Sactuary City for illegal activity!
2007-09-01 10:05:58 · answer #2 · answered by ShadowCat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It makes no sense at all. Whiuchever way you look at it she is not coming back to the USA. If she seeks to enter legally she is not going to have an easy time even after her disbarment is up.
If we have a change in administration and she gets allowed back in through some dubious re-interpretation of US immigration law, she is going to be looking over her shoulder for the rest of her life.
Either way, she has no viable future here. Therefore, there is no sense in leaving her child behind.
2007-09-01 10:03:48 · answer #3 · answered by skip 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Anchor Baby, that is all.
She is unfit to be a mother. No mother would leave a child behind.
She needs to stay in Mexico, and change her country. Not come her and change our country to suit her.
If they make her an ambassador, I will be so pissed.
2007-09-01 10:33:13 · answer #4 · answered by smwbugging 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The kid was born in America, therefore a citizen. He is being cared for by other Americans in child protective services, and his mother will never see him again.
2007-09-01 10:21:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would never leave my child behind. All political nonsense as usual.
2007-09-01 10:02:35 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Because she will return our so called laws will be out down fall in America
2007-09-01 10:36:39 · answer #7 · answered by Gypsy Gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She an the rest use there love child for human shields<>?
2007-09-01 10:06:42 · answer #8 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Maybe because sponging off the taxpayer is more important than her child
2007-09-01 10:15:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would not call her a mother. I would call her a coward. Herson served his purpose and can do nothing more for her. She is a very calculating criminal illegal alien. We certainly do not need her kind in this country.
2007-09-01 09:58:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋