2007-08-31 18:34:53 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Hi, Pin! :)
2007-08-31 18:42:15 · update #1
You forgot the intermediate in the process..
It's film is exposed in a camera... stealing a soul in the process
the film is then developed to produce a negative image.
a larger piece of film is then exposed using the negative.
that piece is developed to produce a positive images.
The camera is just a catalyst in the reaction. It survives.
The souls get captured however... which explains the number of absolutely soulless people that we encounter in large US cities that are visits by hoards of camera wielding foreigners.
2007-09-01 04:12:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sigh.
A growing dissatisfaction with the photographic establishment in England and in America at the turn of the century led to the formation of new groups such as the Linked Ring in the UK, and a group of avante-garde photographers in the United States, spearhearded by Stieglitz The American group came to be known as the Photo-Secession.
From November 1905 this group laid on exhibitions of work at "The Little Galleries of the Photo-Secession" at 291 Fifth Avenue, New York, which came to be known simply as "291." Though the idea initially had been to display the new form of photography, the 291 evolved to become a major focal point of modern art. Paintings exhibited included those of Cezanne, Rodin, Matisse, Picasso, and Toulouse-Lautrec. In 1917 the 291, in financial difficulties, closed its doors, though Stieglitz operated other similar galleries up to the 1940s.
2007-08-31 18:44:37 · answer #2 · answered by Karl M 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To take the photographs
2007-08-31 18:42:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If monkeys could fly why are there so many flying people? You are just too bored. Get a hobby or a girlfriend. It's the probably the same thing for you.
2007-08-31 18:45:55 · answer #4 · answered by A B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because most cameras aren't built to self-destruct, except on "Mission Impossible?"
2007-08-31 18:40:45 · answer #5 · answered by Petrushka's Ghost 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Silly one, photo's cant reproduce themselves, they are a slave to the camera. You must understand that their evolutionary process is much more complex than our own.
2007-08-31 19:14:37 · answer #6 · answered by the Ice Cream Lady 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because you need the source of the product, wait, we don't need the source of humanity. Hmmm.
2007-08-31 18:42:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Uh, I'll take I have no clue for 200, Alex.
2007-08-31 18:41:08 · answer #8 · answered by Becca 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
thats like asking "since i came from my mom, why are there still pregnant women"
2007-08-31 18:40:38 · answer #9 · answered by ieieiweroiweoiieieieiieiwoiehfui 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that's a bit hard to follow.....
Since you posted this in the Religion section, i will assume you're drunk.
Photographs DO come from cameras.
Cameras are still around, because people desire new photographs.
answered........
2007-08-31 18:41:18 · answer #10 · answered by looks like a human 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋