really it is confusing. They have plenty of oil. Furthermore jobs have flown out of American and gone to many different countries including Mexico. Yet they still come up looking for jobs.
Who is doing the jobs the Mexicans won't do in their own country?
2007-08-31 18:31:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Are you saying that Mexico should adopt socialism in order to solve for you the dubious "problem" that there is immigration from Mexico to the US? Also, just because a country has a lot of oil doesn't make it rich. It works for the countries with very small populations, like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, but not so well for countries like Mexico and Nigeria which have populations of 100 million.
2007-09-01 01:13:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Thomas M 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Here is a linked article to substantiate what you say about Mexico being a wealthy country, with the capacity to provide for all its people, and that it's unnecessary for illegals to come here to the U.S., for what they should be demanding from their own government:
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/2/26/164611.shtml
Specifically:
' One of the most common misconceptions is that Mexico is a poor nation. Mexico has a lot of poverty, yes, but it's not "poor." In terms of the potential to obliterate much of that poverty, Mexico has one of the greatest capacities in all of the Americas to do just that. It is rich in natural resources and, should it decide to tap those resources, could eradicate much of its own destitution.
"Mexico is the richest nation in Latin America when measured by GDP, and by a wide margin: in 2001, Mexico's GDP was the highest in Latin America, a substantial 22.5 percent more than runner-up Brazil," writes Walker. "When GDP per capita is the gauge, Mexico is second only behind Argentina." '
2007-09-01 02:09:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stiffler 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
That's a good question. Mexico has a >$1.2 trillion GDP and their oil industry is nationalised..
Sigy - La Senorita de los Bridges
[To Abusive Reporters: If I learn that this question is removed than I will write to answers-abuse@cc.yahoo-inc.com to support the asker and protest the removal]
2007-09-01 01:14:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥ ~Sigy the Arctic Kitty~♥ 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Mexico's money is controlled by the upper 2-3%. There is NO middle class. You live in a poorly constructed home and barely eat, or you are the very upper class that celebrate world cruises every summer.
We have Trump, Gates, and, other millionaires/billionaires. They are not solely supporting "single mothers" or "drug addicts". Why would they?
2007-09-01 00:52:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Amanda h 5
·
2⤊
4⤋
Why should they? They expect the United States to do that for them.
2007-09-01 00:56:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋