ahahaha huh? You ok?
2007-08-30 10:08:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by rukkus31 2
·
6⤊
0⤋
nicely, different than for the U.S. being too vulnerable to try this different than in some banana republics (so stated as by way of fact the banana agencies - Dole, and so forth. - desirous to run issues their way, not interior the U.S. way) and leaving aside that Britain, Spain, and Portugal would have been aggravated, you could desire to take a intense look the rebellions in those international locations which you're focused on - the voters fought for their independence from others and would have from us. and you will desire to observe that we did a extremely undesirable activity interior the international locations we did invade - Woodrow Wilson had a extremely racist physique of innovations as he appeared down his nostril and chosen invasion places.
2016-10-17 07:35:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
When I was in my teens I could not understand why that had never happened. In truth the Manifest Destiny folks in the 19th century proposed it. Unfortunately the only way it would happen is the way we took over the Western half of the US, kill off the current owners and move in our own settlers.
If it makes enough sense economically for all concerned you might eventually see some sort of stronger economic ties between the US, Canada and Mexico - common currency and such, but that is about it.
2007-08-30 10:26:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Info_Please 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Wow.... Valley Girl redoes Manifest Destiny.
Yeah, they do seem to want thier land. That would explain the several wars that they fought over it.
No. Other people's property is not "up for Grabbs ".
I think you may wish to revisit your idea.
2007-08-30 10:14:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Not sure where you are heading with your diatribe? If you are even thinking a US / Canuck merger you are very mistaken. The best way to determine if a person is Canadian is to accuse them about being an American. You really need a trip to Canada to know the difference.
2007-08-30 10:14:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robb R 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Don't listen to yourself- South Americans do want their land. Just because you don't like how they use it, doesn't mean that you personally have any say in the matter. My goodness, aren't we feeling entitled today!
2007-08-30 10:09:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Beardog 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
As a test for your premise why not invade Venezuela?
Of course it wouldn't be for the oil now,would it?
2007-08-30 10:16:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is the most ignorant Comment i've heard.
Learn more before you talk about something.
2007-08-30 18:31:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
why would we want any part of South America as part of the USA? so we can have more poor uneducated people here draining our coffers? we have enough here already.
2007-08-30 10:12:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by darrell m 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
All I can say is...what are you talking about?
2007-08-30 10:07:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by mustagme 7
·
7⤊
1⤋