An anonymous poster by the handle "achtung_heiss" attempts to answer every question at Yahoo Answers concerning the secret affliation of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (corporation in NYC) with a reference to the mentioned website as well as Watchtower's official website, (which is like asking Adolf Hitler if Adolf Hitler is good). A carefull review if the website revealed only blank forms and straw man arguments containing no substance.
2007-08-30 09:23:43 · 7 answers · asked by expositors 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No it is not accurate...it is smoke and mirrors...Heiss is the WBTS stepford christian..I think he works for them...He spends his time cruising Yahoo answers answering all witness questions...not some but ALL.
He has been cought several times outright lying.....I will add some links for you.http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Aih6f31tl12kgYhIe.RaUZ3ty6IX?qid=20070828191739AAr26n6&show=7#profile-info-8d3vlrOZaa
http://towerwatch.com
no truer statement has Mosies ever uttered!
2007-08-30 15:09:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
people who have bad thing to say about J W rely on hearsay evidence, they heard a bell ring but don't know where the bell is
2014-08-11 11:02:08 · answer #2 · answered by Douglas 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John, did you see the spin the website put on the UN situation? now it's the UN lying about JW involvement! of course, everyone lies about the JWs, no one EVER tells the truth about them. That's why they're SO persecuted. Please.
what benefit would it be to the UN to lie about JW membership as an NGO? it doesn't matter anyway, if they were a little involved at any level with the UN, they were kit and kaboodle involved. You can't play in the mud puddle without getting soiled, as one JW told me about being involved with ex-JWs. I would htink the reverse logic would apply to the Watchtower Society's involvement with the UN as an NGO. Still got dirty.
Lies and persecution, oh the suffering. wah wah wah. It's time to own your sins, WBTS.
2007-08-30 17:27:14 · answer #3 · answered by PediC 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
A carefull review? you did a careful review and found that only blank forms and straw man arguments containing no substance.
What is the differences? is their opinion and now you don´t want people read that opinion instead your one, what is the differences?
2007-08-30 16:46:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Anti-witness websites are many. People who know nothing about JW's love to go to those sites and copy-and-paste misinformation and make it appear as though they knew these "trues" all along, which they aren't. If I knew you were, say, a Lutheran, I would go to an anti-Lutheran website and copy-and-paste all kinds of dirt about you as if I were an expert of your faith.
If you want to know info of God, would you go to Satan for such info? If you want to know the truth about JW's, ask them directly. If you want to know anything about achtung_heiss, why not ask him?
2007-08-30 16:55:07 · answer #5 · answered by LineDancer 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
could not find the website for this question
i'm not sure what your question is
2007-08-30 17:01:12 · answer #6 · answered by magnetic_azimuth 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I cant reed so i dont no if it trew or not i just listen and believe achtung_heiss propaganda i dont need to think for meself im a jehovah witness
2007-08-30 23:32:13 · answer #7 · answered by bobsbigboy 1 · 0⤊ 7⤋