Bristol used to be. Now I'd have to say Martinsville but I really like Richmond too. Short tracks give a much needed change of pace from side by side racing. I love the bump and run squeeze in pi**ed off antics the drivers must endure with high blood pressure medications. Very fun to watch and see the battle du jour.
2007-08-30 10:00:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Honey 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bristol
Richmond
Martinsville
All the short tracks are a kick in the pants.
2007-08-30 09:02:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by blakree 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Personally, I like Richmond the best. Bristol and Martinsville are too short. Everyone is packed too closely together! Richmond gives them a little breathing room anyway :)
2007-08-30 08:59:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by shaggy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've been to Bristol its so so . Not a big fan of short track;s..Never been to Richmond ,but it looks okay on tv and I'm sure not a fan of Martinsville as its tooooooooo flat
2007-08-30 08:55:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by NasCarl #99 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Martinsville
2007-08-30 12:32:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bryan M 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bristol, then Martinsville, then Richmond.
Go Jr.>>>>
2007-08-30 10:12:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
thats a tough one, I've been to all 3, I'd probably have to go with Richmond, Bristol, then Martinsville.. I've seen great racing at all three..
2007-08-30 09:10:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Go Team Penske 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Since they messed with Bristol, I'll have to say Martinsville.
2007-08-30 09:25:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by omichels24 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'd have to go with Martinsville. Some people say it's too flat, but that's what I like most about it. There are very few tracks that have that little banking to them, and I think it makes the drives change the way they have to approach it.
2007-08-30 09:40:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by RustyL71 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I've been to all three several times. I say it is a tie between Richmond & Bristol for me. They're all great tracks though.
2007-08-30 08:58:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by tigrompy 3
·
2⤊
0⤋