English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this enforceable or even desireable?

The Chinese government has prohibited Budhist Llamas from practicing reincarnation.

Source. UK Channel 4 news item

2007-08-30 06:25:37 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

14 answers

I don't know mate it is a perfectly intelligent question.
Though I don't see how even the Chinese Goverment can control whether souls reincarnate or not.
There are however certain people on this site that seem to give violations for no apparent reason other than spite. Sorry

2007-08-30 06:37:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I saw that the Chinese authorities were only going to allow "licensed" reincarnations for Tibetan lamas.

< "an important move to institutionalize the management of reincarnation" were passed by the State Administration of Religious Affairs (SARA) for implementation from September 1.>

Bureaucracy gone insane.

I've no idea why that was an unacceptable comment, unless you technically infringed by failing to phrase it as a question.

But even so I didn't know Chinese authoritarianism had reached Peru. (That's where the llamas are. Sorry, but it's one of the classic keyboard slip-ups))

2007-08-30 08:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Pedestal 42 7 · 0 0

BEIJING, CHINA, August 4, 2007: Tibet’s living Buddhas have been banned from reincarnation without permission from China’s atheist leaders. The ban is included in new rules intended to assert Beijing’s authority over Tibet’s restive and deeply Buddhist people. “The so-called reincarnated living Buddha without government approval is illegal and invalid,” according to the order, which comes into effect on September 1. The 14-part regulation issued by the State Administration for Religious Affairs is aimed at limiting the influence of Tibet’s exiled god-king, the Dalai Lama, and at preventing the re-incarnation of the 72-year-old monk without approval from Beijing. It is the latest in a series of measures by the Communist authorities to tighten their grip over Tibet.

me: I believe that it is their problem. I stay away from commenting.

2007-08-30 08:47:02 · answer #3 · answered by Davinci22 3 · 1 0

I know. It's ridiculous some of the things that don't get deleted. It's also ridiculous the things that do. I saw someone once answer a question about violation notices that said she had received one because she said she did not like rice cakes! I have no idea why your question was deleted. I can't see what is wrong with it either!

2007-08-30 13:06:58 · answer #4 · answered by We can but try 2 · 0 0

Good luck to the Chinese government! How are they planning on enforcing this prohibition, I wonder?

2007-08-30 13:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by Orla C 7 · 0 0

Yes I saw This News Item as well and Therefore is regarded
as being in The Public Domain.

2007-08-30 06:41:45 · answer #6 · answered by sorbus 3 · 0 0

No, and it doesn`t have to be. Violations on here are usually given by someone who wants to have a go at you, and others, vindictive, spiteful, and any other adjectives you can think of for petty-minded people.
For YAHOO to uphold a violation it has only to be posted and they give the complainant the benefit of the doubt while he/she remains anonymous.

2007-08-30 06:38:22 · answer #7 · answered by Montgomery B 4 · 0 0

Don't ask me - I've had so many baffling violations and seen so many really bad things let through from others I'm beginning to think it is just random and aliens are staffing yahoo answers.
Your example is one of the craziest violations I've seen.

2007-08-30 06:38:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yahoo is scared of the Chinese Govt, just like Google & all the internet 'establishment'.

2007-08-30 06:35:49 · answer #9 · answered by Well, said Alberto 6 · 0 0

Maybe because the Chinese will one day take over the world!!!

2007-08-30 06:36:22 · answer #10 · answered by Choose ME 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers