Why are you skeptics so high maintenance?
Here ya go..Reg my post on the 8/31st Revelation.
http://www.space.com/searchforlife/070823_seti_2000yearold.html
2007-08-30 05:12:14 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
so a natural cosmic occurance...and NOT our first meteor shower...proves to you that armeggedon is coming?
really, crimmson, why do you focus on the death and destruction aspect of the bible so much? it's not healthy.
2007-08-30 05:23:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No website is inherently credible, but unless they're lying about the author's credentials that article probably is.
The problem with your question was that you connected the fact that some meteors have existed as meteors for a little over 2000 years to a completely unrelated Biblical passage. "a third of the sun, a third of the moon, and a third of the stars were struck" has absolutely nothing to do with anything in your link, nor does it relate in any way to the age of the meteors. I mean seriously, did you put any thought into this or did you just think 'Hey, that's about space. And the sun, moon and stars are in space too, so it must be the same thing'?
2007-08-30 05:23:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nice link! But what about the end of days stuff? There is nothing on space.com to even indicate any destruction much less the sun being impacted. In fact this is a relatively minor shower and it's only significance is that it is elusive and that we know what asteroid it came form. And by the way, it's hit the earth several times in the past.
2007-08-30 05:18:49 · answer #3 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The article indicates that Kiess is about 2003 years old. And?
2007-08-30 05:44:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its more skeptic of how your linking things to be proof of the revelation.
you make no sense 99% of the time.
u talk about a comet and then talk about how 1/3 of the sun doesnt shine, and u somehow pretend the 2 are linked....
2007-08-30 05:15:42 · answer #5 · answered by Chippy v1.0.0.3b 6 · 7⤊ 1⤋
OK....so some chunks that fell off the back end of a comet two thousand years ago are about to hit the Earth....so what?
2007-08-30 05:18:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Goddidit.
2007-08-30 05:18:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yeah
darned skeptics and their demands for you to provide some actual proper evidence that your wild claims are true
2007-08-30 06:31:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not the credibility of the articles we take issue with, it's your interpretations of them.
2007-08-30 05:21:09 · answer #9 · answered by Murazor 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Bark, Bark, Bark.
Howl.
2007-08-30 05:16:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋