LOL! A lesbian who says she is following the Bible either does not understand the Bible, or is a hypocrite who is willfully rebelling against the Bible. I would not support either.
2007-08-30 04:10:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
Greetings all,
A woman first of all has only learned from what the man has taught them, until they began teaching themselves what man taught them. Now if man themselves are wrong in the interpretations of the bible and law and such, that would make the woman wrong to begin with that has learned from the man. Why do you think 2/3 of Elohim Himself came as His own Son and picked 4 men? Lesbian or not a woman would lead this country to destruction, especially if she was Christian. There is nothing special about Christians my brothers and sisters. You are just a deceived as the Muslim and Jew.
k716, as well as most others who have these corrupted bible versions with false interpretations in them, better burn them and go back to the early version, King James and be a 4th grader and read it. So easy-to-read and understand a 4.3 grade reading level book. This book simply just needs to be read all over again with a different mind, heart and being.
Romans 1:24-27 does not refer to sexual lusts nor homosexuality at all. Romans 1:24 just SIMPLY means: That Elohim gave men up to follow after the thought of the imagination of their heart and their own desire. Lust just means desire here nothing else. Also men used to scar their bodies and pierce them, thus dishonoring their own bodies. They may have went as far as human sacrifice. 1:25 Is speaking of Elohim as "God" not being reverenced as the Creator and man serving Yeheveh or Jehovah as "the LORD" as the creature, as the men of Israel were doing.
IN 1:26 the words affections is not human, nothing having to do with these verse is humanly. The affection spoken is the love for a tyrannical warLORD in the Old Testament that there would believe and worship as God and women following after the same traditions, Ear piercings, nose rings and neck stretchers and such as that would be included in here. 1:27 is men leaving the women out of their plans to invent, build and dominate the earth, men putting woman down to a submissive level giving man a better feeling of fulfilling their desires. Before this homosexuality was a common thing, David and Daniel both had relations as well as most of the women, believe it or not. Because of man's domination, the woman did join together and groups and here it might mean sex too, but this would have been brought on by the man putting them down to the level of submission. 1:28. Is because man had not yet had the knowledge of Elohim, even though He gave simple scriptures and they could not interpret them right, He gave them a mind that would reject, criticize and be judgmental that made do things and make them complicated. Get a clue before you answer foolishly.
I am only here for one reason. Stomp the devil in the ground and tell him his time is through. It's not my fault I just found out after all this time that he is the LORD god of Israel. This one known as Yeheveh or Jehovah, the same one the Christians think is Jesus. There is a whole other "God" and "Jesus Christ" both and you better know it is The Truth.
The Brother of Jesus Christ, Prince Abdullah Ahad Ruhd Shihn
2007-08-30 14:01:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nohahim Ben Elohim 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Cat, check YOUR bible again...
Romans 1:24-27
24Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—who is forever praised. Amen.
26Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their WOMEN exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. 27In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion.
And homosexual refers to men and women...check your dictionary.
1 Cor. 6:9-10 -- 9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
2007-08-30 11:22:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by kaz716 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Absolutely. Check your Bible again. It mentions nothing about lesbianism being a sin. It only mentions sodomy, because it was written by men who feared such a thing. Oddly enough, something they might have enjoyed watching is not prohibited. Huh.
And, anyway, religious beliefs are not the sole predictor (if, indeed, they are any predictor), of how someone would run a country.
2007-08-30 11:12:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cat 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
The bible-following bit is pretty scary, as it could cause her to have mislead ideas regarding political situations, and could also cause her to make some poor choices for the citizens. As far as being a lesbian, why would you care about someone's sex life???
2007-08-30 11:09:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Yes, if she could separate between her work and her life. Am Egyptian , but i liked to answer that question. Thanx.
Good luck!
2007-08-30 13:20:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by cleopatra 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If she is qualified for the job, I'd say yes. how many male presidents had sexual relations while in the white house? One should separate church and state!
2007-08-30 11:12:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Gerry 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
If they were following the Bible they wouldn't be a lesbian.
2007-08-30 11:08:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by tracy211968 6
·
6⤊
4⤋
If you mean the usa, it would make no difference
2007-08-30 11:08:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by nadie 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
If George Bush can lie & be elected, why cant a lesbian?
2007-08-30 11:11:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gesus is ded 1
·
4⤊
4⤋