viet nam welcome everybody to visit. a peaceful place
2007-08-29 18:09:58 · 16 answers · asked by TLT 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Nobody. I believe it is referred to as Armageddon.
2007-08-29 18:48:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
omg a thought out intelligent answer...
Plus your forgetting how many nations are in NATO your talking about India Germany, France and Great Britain. Germany and the U.K. have both proven themselves to be tough states beating them is unlikely as well as the US who seeing as we have distance would be able to better contemplate the fight.
I know it seems hard to believe but huge numbers does not mean your going to win the Russians were only able to win against the Germans because the British, not the US even though I’m an American Soldier I understand we didn’t do everything in that or really any war we have ever fought, were breaking the supply lines in Germany and well as the French destroying the source of the supply lines in their country.
The Nuclear question is given proper perspective and funding could be answered with the defense system already available but locked up in politics a place were it should of never been in the first place , very soon the NUKE will be an all but forgotten weapon.
2007-08-29 20:27:24 · answer #2 · answered by Commodevil 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why are USA always fighting China. How about a war that didn't involved China and Russia. I'm pretty sure that is more likely. After the 1990's Russia's economy got destroyed. And China won't want to waste money on war when they are going so well already. But the US would like to strectch their legs a bit and start a war.
2016-05-17 04:54:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Such a conflict would quickly turn into a nuclear exchange. In that case, North Korea would cease to exist, hell, it's already starving to death now. China, Russia, and America would be devastated by the bombs. The "winner" will be the one who can rebuild the quickest. That, I believe, would be the U.S. China, once its communist leadership is gone, would break up into small warring factions. Russia, already a shadow of itself, would fall into anarchy. The infrastructure of both those nations is already so fragile that the nuclear exchange would push it beyond all repair. The U.S., on the other hand, has the advantage of individuals who can think, plan, and act on their own. Devastated as the land might be, there will be places to build on and grow and there is enough redundancy built into the infrastructure that the rebuilding could be accomplished.
2007-08-29 20:19:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It depends on the type of warfare. If its on land China, Russia, North Korea would most likely win. However, if it's in the air or in the sea the America and NATO would most likely win.
2007-08-29 18:23:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well as a military nerd, I would say Russia,China & North Korea. China has the "biggest" Army in the world. I am going to say it again"BIGGEST" Army. North Korea it is the 4th powerful country in the world. Russia........well back then the Soviets were powerful & today Russia was not like before. At least they have a unique green berets known the "SPETSNAZ".
The U.S. may be powerful like the Roman Empire but, no match & Empire they do fall.
2007-08-29 19:43:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
most likely never going 2 happen...but if it does, most likely a nuclear holocaust so no body wins...but if not then:
Well the war is undoubtly gonna be fought on land. China and them don't stand a chance in seas, so they wont try. So honestly US cant win cause China itself has one of the strongest coastal defenses, and along with a mil soldiers with about a hundred mil 2wk long trained militia...you jsut cant win lol. So ya there you go. I havent even factored in Russia and stuff.
2007-09-02 06:28:31 · answer #7 · answered by CGAR 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The cockroaches, because they will be the only ones left
Two things that you should know: Never fight a land war in Asia and Never go against America when Nuclear war is on the line
2007-08-29 18:27:35 · answer #8 · answered by Jon 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
well the US of course Russia and China could not carry out small operations together because they are totally different......well if china wanted to fight the war in their country all we would need is 10 million of the hispanic population and we would be in there country before they even hear is come in......lol.....it would be bato loco style.....lol
2007-08-30 16:36:59 · answer #9 · answered by Edgar R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America.
China Russia and North Korea couldn't agree on anything if there life depended on it.
2007-08-29 18:13:33 · answer #10 · answered by Rek T 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
If that happens I'm getting the hell out of the u.s. and moving to a country where they have no enemies lol.
2007-08-29 19:44:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋