English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who is right? Who is wrong? Who will burn, who will be going for the cake and a nice time in Heaven? There is an easy way to decide:

Answer me this:

Evolutionism (atheiestics) says something like that if you put a pile of rocks on the floor and leave them for a thousand years or maybe more...then they will turn into a lemure or a monkey then men.

I will bet that the pile of rocks wouldn't even become a simple car , let alone a complexated humanist?

UNLESS someone made some steel of the rocks and built it into a car? There is the clue.

Now...answer me this:

Who built the car? A creator did.

Now where is your atheistics? Your logic? Disproven again. Crickets for you.

What will you do? There is still time to save U b4 the End Time.

What is it to be, athiests???

A. Accept The Jesus into yr Heart?

B Still going to burn?

2007-08-29 09:47:48 · 58 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Angeltress gets it. No-one else bcuz all u athiets are full of hatred all u can do is b rude and offer no logistics. Crickets chirp.

2007-08-29 10:07:12 · update #1

toogethr: Says no cake in heaven? Huh and u know that? Heaven is paved with gold and ther will b rivers. Rivers R physical and so is the clothes that U will be wearing lik erobes. All will B perfect including my nice angel cale, LOLOL!!!11

2007-08-29 10:09:15 · update #2

*angle cake. Sorry for spelling error I'm humanistic too.

2007-08-29 10:10:04 · update #3

58 answers

We both know that a pile of rocks will never "evolve" into any kind of living thing, ever.
I think these atheists know it, too...but they can't admit it, because then they'd have to admit that they might be...
uh...
what is that word, again?
Give me a minute, I'll think of it!
We know that atheists know all about science, and they all read the Bible, too...
so they could never
ever
ever
be


WRONG!!!!!

sheesh!!

^sarcasm, with my tongue firmly in my cheek^

God bless!!

2007-08-29 09:56:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 10

Very silly question.

Here goes:

Evolutionism (atheiestics) says something like that if you put a pile of rocks on the floor and leave them for a thousand years or maybe more...then they will turn into a lemure or a monkey then men.

Wrong. Evolution is a scientific theory about how species chance over millions and billions of years due to genetic mutations and natural selection. It is not random. Read about it.


Who built the car? A creator did.

Wrong again. Humans assume that god created everything because we create things for a purpose and are capable of forward planning. That does not mean it is true.

A. Accept Jesus?

You've just revealed your agenda. You have no proof that your god is real, that your afterlife exists, or that evolution is incorrect. Score.

2007-08-29 11:25:26 · answer #2 · answered by Dalarus 7 · 3 0

You are just regurgitating stale, old, meaningless "arguments". I will bet that these were told to you by your church.

Answer me this. If the bible is so perfect, then why so many flaws in it? The biggest one that I can think of right off the bat is the two creation stories. Genesis 1 tells one account and Genesis 2 tells a different account. However, they differ from each other. One has man and woman being created together and the other has man being created, then animals, then woman. At best one is right and at worst both are wrong. In any event, there is an error in the bible. If it was a divine document, this should not have happened.

I know, I know, you will just ignore this and keep going, but people will point this stuff out to you.

Also, by the way, the theory of evolution has never said that a pile of rocks will turn into a lemure or an automobile. You are just showing off how little scientific knowledge you have.

2007-08-29 09:55:44 · answer #3 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 8 0

I hate to be the one to piss in the pool and ruin the party, but the term atheist doesn't mean "believes in evolution" in the way that Christianity means "believes in God". Atheism is the belief that there is no God and nothing more.

However, you're wrong in the sense that you think evolution has anything to do with rocks and lemurs. Evolution is the belief that one organism can branch off into many different organisms that don't necessarily look like their original "mother" in a sense. This doesn't go to say that an animal has offspring and each is a new animal, it just suggests that one animal is the "base" of many other species. Evolution in no way explains how these organisms change from one to another - just that they do. Separate theories from the individual explain how each changes from one to another, but the principle belief doe not.

You go on to the watch-maker argument, where everything needs a creator, in a sense. Something intelligent to design it. However, if you're so dead set on the argument that everything needs a creator - who created God? How can God always be, but nothing else can follow the same river of logic?

2007-08-29 11:40:17 · answer #4 · answered by Alley S. 6 · 3 0

is that the choice? accept jesus or burn in hell! now here i was thinking christianity was a religion built on forgiveness and acceptance of others.

As for evolution: if you put a rock down and leave it for a thousand years it will still be a rock, or maybe sand. However if you were to put a lemur down and leave it for a few hundred thousand years it may well adapt and evolve over time into something different (well it wont but its ancestors might)

look at humans, we are evolving all the time. walk into an old cottage built several hundred years ago and most of us will have to watch our heads. why? because today we are taller than we were several hundred years ago, this is us evolving! OK its only a minor change but over millions of years all of these minor changes can become a major change.

2007-08-29 11:30:54 · answer #5 · answered by Stephen M 6 · 4 0

Here is my logistics:

1) Ridicule your misspellings and incorrect usage.
2) Dismiss your "question" without wasting the effort to refute it
3)Sit back and see how many thumbs down I receive.

Step 1

logistics: The organization of any project or operation.

humanist: of or pertaining to a philosophy asserting human dignity and man's capacity for fulfillment through reason and scientific method and often rejecting religion (Nobody said the rock-monkey-man had to be a humanist)

complexated: No definitions were found for complexated.

Step 2:

You really expect anyone who's not already rabidly agreeing with you to be swayed by this pile of manure. My 5 year old could blow holes in that argument. In her sleep.

Commence step 3...

2007-08-29 10:43:20 · answer #6 · answered by Recreant- father of fairies 4 · 7 0

neither, both, neither, and neither.

you should do some reading... the dictionary and origin of species come to mind... atheistics, and complexated are not words, and humanist is a system of beliefs... therefore, i have no athesitics.

and saying that nonliving anything magically turns into complex life is the claim that creationism makes, not evolution. You're screwing your own argument!

and you may quite possibly go beyond an absence of understanding of evolution. evolution makes no claim that rocks turn into people over a thousand years. I'm not going to waste my time explaining the facts to you because it will clearly fly several miles over your head, so I'll leave it by saying that you're a bloody moron.

*edit*
angeltress:
"We both know that a pile of rocks will never "evolve" into any kind of living thing, ever.
I think these atheists know it, too...but they can't admit it, because then they'd have to admit that they might be...
uh... WRONG!!"

wow... have you read the other answers? every one has said... what now? that rocks don't evolve into any kind of living thing ever? wow... dufus.
*/edit*

2007-08-29 10:07:04 · answer #7 · answered by Sacred Chao 4 · 7 0

That's not a riddle, although it doesn't surprise me that you don't know what a riddle is considering how badly you're butchering the English language. (My apologies if English isn't your first language, though I bet it is.)

What atheist ever said rocks could eventually become monkeys and people? Rid your ignorance before you try "saving" others from theirs.

Evolutionism and atheism don't always equate. Many Christians believe there's truth in evolution, just as many atheists do not believe it to be true.

I choose option C: get some ice cream.
The world would be a happier place if everyone choose option C.

2007-08-29 10:05:18 · answer #8 · answered by ima.bubble 3 · 3 0

Are you taking the p!ss? You have to be!

You can't surely be that uneducated and misinformed.

You have no concept of Evolution, especially from a scientific point of view. I'm not surprised, then, that you believe in an illogical, unreasonable "god".

Someone who believes in a bi-polar, misogynistic, homophobic, murderous, bigotted, abusive, hypocritical, corrupt, evil "god" (who preaches morals while allowing his own son to be killed) has no logic.

So, get yourself some education and then come back with an argument instead of your fairy tales.

What am I going to do? Carry on the way I have been going. Carry on being logical, tolerant, open-minded, moral, loving, sharing, caring, and most important ATHEIST.

P.S. Don't you realise "hell" was invented to control weak, vulnerable people who had no concept of the real world, such as yourself.

2007-08-29 11:42:31 · answer #9 · answered by GayAtheist 4 · 3 0

"Evolutionism (atheiestics) says something like that if you put a pile of rocks on the floor and leave them for a thousand years or maybe more...then they will turn into a lemure or a monkey then men."

That was a piss-poor straw-man argument, and it completely destroys your credibility. Why can't you actually state FACTS about what they theory of evolution actually SAYS before you criticize it? You need to completely make something up that has nothing to do with the theory of evolution in order to criticize it. (Typical of creationists.)

And you think that your story that we need to believe in an invisible, mystical, supernatural being or we're going to burn is more plausible than a scientific theory that has astronomical amounts of evidence to back it up?

Did you make it out of third grade?

2007-08-29 09:57:06 · answer #10 · answered by Jess H 7 · 8 0

He sounds like a Catholic to me trying to force his fake religion on to everybody and with your :-

A accept the jesus into your heart

B still going to burn

Why should we ???? if what YOU choose to believe in is true we are all gods creatures that can make our own choices whether we believe or not he should still love us should he not?? And what makes you think that what you believe is true? Is it because you had it forced upon you by your parents before you had the chance to make your own decisions. Also what is in the bible how can you believe that to be true it was written many years after Jesus had died so if there is any truth it probably got twisted round generation after generation a little bit added a little bit taken away a bit like chinese whispers. The bible to me is nothing but fantasy the Beano probably has more truth in it if you want to take an alternative look at how the world was created i suggest you look up Erich von Daniken go on I DARE you to open up your minds.

2007-08-29 21:04:53 · answer #11 · answered by bullet_2k4 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers