or just for health and survival?
2007-08-29 09:26:02 · 8 answers · asked by slopoke6968 7 in Food & Drink ➔ Cooking & Recipes
I believe it should be pleasureable. I also believe working should be pleasurable. Too bad they can't both always be pleasureable for everyone!
2007-08-29 09:41:28 · answer #1 · answered by Clare 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well i guess it depends upon the situation right
we're lucky enough to be able to eat for pleasure, even when we're not starving from hunger.
its something that we all take for granted once in awhile, myself i know that i enjoy food so much that it is like a hobby, but its more important for us to give to others when we can, so that they can survive and we can definitely live without the added pleasure right.
2007-08-29 16:45:34 · answer #2 · answered by babyj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eating should always be pleasurable. Also it should be healthy as well. Too much of anything is bad for you!
2007-08-29 20:37:31 · answer #3 · answered by luckychrmz_70 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
by all means it should be enjoyable. However you do not have to live for eating, but eating for living. Health and survival is the main key, but you can enjoy your meals in the process.
2007-08-29 16:58:04 · answer #4 · answered by deliciasyvariedades 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should be pleasureable.
2007-08-29 18:27:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should be pleasureable!
2007-08-29 17:09:14 · answer #6 · answered by Lydd ☂ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All if possible.I love to eat and chat with friends and family,don't you????
2007-08-29 18:51:00 · answer #7 · answered by Maw-Maw 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whateva''
2007-08-29 19:57:05 · answer #8 · answered by kay kay 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋