George Bush said yesterday that IRAN has been the leading sponsor of terrorism in the Middle East for years-Bush just does not know how to shut his mouth-so based on his info he attacked IRAQ-he is a stooge.
2007-08-29 06:47:28 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Why do you want to attack anyone ?
Aren't there other ways ?
2007-08-29 06:57:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Watson (UK) 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Attack them?
No give them both just enough rope to hang themselves. I say arm both of them and let them attack each other. They are both crazy why pick one to attack or attack them at all?
Damn I miss Ronald Reagan.
Iran is the real sponsor of terrorism that is the fact of the matter.
I think we went into Iraq due to bad intelligence combined with personal influence by the President.
However we are there now. We must do whatever we have to in order to accomplish stable democracy there. We cannot let Iran claim victory there.
To say that Iran has delusions of grandeur is a huge understatement. They feel that their culture is supreme, and that it is some kind of ill-fated trick of fate that they are not ruling the world right now.
I am not making this up, they are willing to do anything to become the only power on the planet.
I dont know about the every day Iranian people I only know about their government. The everyday Iranian people are a non-entity to me because they have no real power at all in Iran.
-----------------------------------------------------
To anyone mentioning China as a threat....
China is not communist, but they play one on TV....at least thats how it is now.
2007-08-29 06:56:25 · answer #2 · answered by h h 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You've never played RISK before, have ya???
We had soldiers in Afghanistan and Kuwait. We are allies with Saudi Arabia.. So we attacked Saddams regime and took him out of power, and are currently fighting terrorists there...
Now we have soldiers on both sides of Iran (Afghanistan and Iraq). We are also allies with Pakistan...
So If Iran starts anything, they are already surrounded... They have nowhere to go except Turkmenistan or the Gulf... But the US Navy will be blocking the Gulf...
Victory is Ours.....
2007-08-29 06:58:06 · answer #3 · answered by Dan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some dogs are better left barking.We cannot make world a safer place.But one thing we can do is make America safer and advanced.And make its citizens advanced.The entire money spend on Iraq would it be better if utilized to improve our country.
There are idiots around the world frm Chavez to Castro who rule some strips of land and claim that they can take on US.Better leave them to their business they can never achieve wht America or its citizens have achieved.
Iraq has proved to be a black hole that sucks money frm American tax payer.And US is in debt.And George Bush oh how i think such idiots get into power in The worlds most powerful democracy.Cina is fast catching up and i cant baer the thought of a communist country as the worlds super power.They are so stable than Russia
2007-08-29 06:59:36 · answer #4 · answered by Roshan A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We shouldnt of attacked either. You see Al Qaeda is a sunni Arab organisation. Not a Shii'te Persian organisation. Originally Iran wasn't and shouldnt've been our enemy but Bush expanded this war with goals no nation could meet. Now it feels we have 1/6 of humanity as our enemy.
Bush needs to re-evaluate the War and what our priorities are instead of being scatter brained. Such weakness will lead the next president down a dangerous path
2007-08-29 07:16:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There was legal basis to go to both Afghanistan and Iraq. None to invade Iran. Since we were already in Afghanistan and the real problem is Iran you take the path you can.....
Does the game of chess come to mind?
You take advantage of situations. Perfection does not happen in war. You always take the easy ground.
You don't have to believe me, call them all idiots if you choose. When playing chess and poker you don't state your real intent.
2007-08-29 06:57:55 · answer #6 · answered by Stand-up philosopher. It's good to be the King 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, Iran did not break it's surrender agreement after the Gulf War. Nor did they violate all 17 UN sanctions against them and kick the UN inspectors out of the country. Nor, did they commit acts of war against the US by firing on US planes in the NO Fly Zone. Nor, did they fail to capitulate to the stipulations put forth by the US in their surrender agreement, and nor did they refuse the ultimadems made by the US in a last ditch effort to get them to comply. So, the US used the last resort of military force on Iraq.
2007-08-29 06:51:11 · answer #7 · answered by booman17 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
could we? definitely no longer. Their government is loopy, yet we are able to furnish help to anti-government communities there somewhat than invading. Iran actual needed us to flow into Iraq to knock off considered one of their community opponents. additionally, they make the main of the chaos in Iraq and our concentration on Iraq. the super source "Curveball" who offered plenty undesirable intel to our protection rigidity on Iraq grow to be probable an Iran operative. We have been so hungry to get into Iraq and get our palms on their oil that we would have listened to something.
2016-10-09 10:01:26 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should have no attacked Iraq or Iran, but insted destroyed them both at the same time.
2007-08-29 06:50:54 · answer #9 · answered by Zymurgy 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Logically yes, they are the head of the serpent and the root of most terrorism over the last 28 years.
2007-08-29 06:51:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
not if you actually knew the reasonings behind the invasion... sad how people forget history and choose to ignore information until it fits their agenda... Iran did not break treaty laws... but, don't worry... we'll take care of Iran soon enough.
2007-08-29 06:58:32 · answer #11 · answered by jasonsluck13 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋