My opinion is that many (most?) Jehovah's Witnesses are not hypocritical themselves, since they probably aren't aware of the UN membership. It's the Governing Body and Watchtower leadership who should be held accountable for their double standard.
2007-08-28 17:18:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by jethrojimbob 2
·
1⤊
5⤋
1. The original application on file did not require a signature, which seems to indicate, or at least gives the perception, that the application for NGO status was merely a formality.
2. The registration papers filed with the UN contained no statements that conflict with our Christian beliefs.
3. NGO status was necessary to gain access to some facilities, documents, and publications.
4. NGOs are informed that "association of NGOs with the DPI does not constitute their incorporation into the UN system, nor does it entitle associated organizations or their staff to any kind of privileges, immunities or special status."
5. There was a changed relationship between the UN and NGOs. The applications, forms, and brochures of the UN also changed to reflect that fact.
6. When the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society realized that the revised document had language that said NGOs would support the UN, etc., they immediately withdrew membership.
There is no cover-up. The truth is that opposers are misrepresenting the facts of the matter.
2007-08-29 06:41:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Octavia 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Jehovah's Witnesses are remarkably unhypocritical. This so-called "question" has several false premises, and the matter concerning "Watchtower" and its NGO status is discussed quite thoroughly (with supporting document images) at this website:
http://jehovahsjudgment.co.uk/watchtower-un-ngo/
Interestingly, the remarkable conspiracy theories of anti-Witness critics fail to explain any possible benefit to Jehovah's Witnesses from any NGO "alliance". Before, during, and since the supposed "alliance", Jehovah's Witnesses continued to publicly denounce the ungodly nature of the UN. Before, during, and since the supposed "alliance", Jehovah's Witnesses continued to be widely persecuted in dozens of countries. Before, during, and since the supposed "alliance", the UN continued to be consistently unsympathetic to religious persecution.
Learn more:
http://watchtower.org/e/20010201/article_02.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/lmn/index.htm?article=article_10.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/20011015/article_02.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/rq/index.htm?article=article_06.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/dg/index.htm?article=article_08.htm
Interestingly, this questioner has also recently asked "Why do the majority of Blacks always Steal?". Outrageous bigotry!
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070828193632AAoLD2o
2007-08-29 07:39:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by achtung_heiss 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
The witnesses hypocritical garbage goes deeper than that. I used to be a Ministerial Servant on the building committee in my state.(basically we were in charge of all construction to further the needs of the cult) I know and have been part of certain situations that would absolutely shock even the hardiest of Jehovah s witnesses. I have had to get personally involved in severe physical and mental abuse cases perpetrated by the cults elders/leaders. But to the brain washed members stuff like that rarely ever sees the light of day. They go on pretending they are the perfect and the only chosen ones. It is really sad.
2007-08-28 22:33:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by golfleafsgolf 2
·
4⤊
6⤋
Satan can't keep his fingers out.
He always exposes who he is. That is how you can tell a true Christian organization from a counterfit one.
How far will the Witneses go away from the Lord before it is obvious to the mainstream Witness that they need to RUN to God?
2007-08-28 23:03:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
Watchthistowerhurtyou gave a great answer!
You indeed nailed it with your question!
2007-08-28 22:56:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋