English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We are definite worse off with Bush and without Saddam. Saddam was no terrorist. He was not bombing Iraq daily Saddam was not killing our soldiers daily. Are poor soldiers are such FOOLs to stand by Bush.Remember Bush's rants about it will be a short war for WMDs and Cheny's last throes comments? All turned out to be false. 4.5 years now with death everyday beyond what Saddam ever caused, and these long tours for our soldiers who did not volunteer to be treated so badly. Bush has failed this country, out soldiers, and Iraq.

2007-08-28 00:56:19 · 6 answers · asked by NAP BQ 5 in Politics & Government Military

6 answers

What you are saying may very well be true. I know Saddam was supposed to be a very bad man but it seems now that he is what it takes to control Iraq.
I was never for the war from day one. I always said that putting Saddam back in power would have been the best thing they could have done.
It is obvious that the Bush administration lied to us about so many things. Also I am not sure why Bush thinks that he is any better then Saddam because he also let torture go on under his administration and killed many more then Saddam.
I personally feel like they are all crazy because Bush said he went to war because god told him to. The terrorist are in a war for Allah. I personally do not think any God would want the torture and death both sides have caused.
Saddam was supposed to have gassed his own people by what our news says. Saddam had stated that it was Iran.
In any case it happened during a war with Iran and there was a casualty. Just like the Bush people say there are casualties of war when they kill innocent woman and children.

2007-08-28 01:15:38 · answer #1 · answered by letfreedomring 6 · 2 0

Bush taking on Saddam is a good thing in world progressing
the only problem is to know how to end his story before his term is up
filling one hole with 5 holes is not proper ending

2007-08-28 08:10:00 · answer #2 · answered by kimht 6 · 0 1

Saddam actually was a terrorist.. and he did actually bomb Iraqis.. in fact he bombed them using chemical weapons. But he didn't have to bomb them, he could just line them up along the street and shoot them. But don't let that stop your Saddam cheerleading.. in fact please continue. The more scum like you do this kind of thing, the more people realize what the left really is..

2007-08-28 08:09:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Everything you said is true. People have a very short memory.

2007-08-28 08:11:38 · answer #4 · answered by wayne g 7 · 1 0

You have gone off the deep end. Nothing you say is true.

2007-08-28 08:00:41 · answer #5 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1 3

No and No....nuff said...

2007-08-30 03:49:05 · answer #6 · answered by Jed J 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers