Amazons, female warriors - chargeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
2007-08-27 22:59:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
So you don't really believe in gender equality?
I thought a feminist sought to achieve parity with men. Are you really suggesting female dominance? If so, are you not committing a deceit when you call yourself a feminist?
Is this just a facade to disguise you true opinion and intentions?
"Hello, I am an extremely experienced feminist from Versailles. I am dedicated to advocating far reaching reforms of the French and English language to prevent discrimination against women. I believe that the decadence of our society is shown by the existence of such terms as 'man' hole cover [instead of personnel access portal] and 'man' made [instead of factory produced] items. I also wish for the outlawing of such expressions as 'French' "
Please explain how this question is consistent with those declared principles.
Your judgement that the world is a mess solely because of men is supported only by your assertion, and the presumption that a female lead would automatically make the planet a paradise is preposterous.
Certainly from the 20th century onwards women have had more influence and must bear some of the responsibility. Margaret Thatcher was a terrible Prime Minister.
I can only assume that you are joking or being deliberately provocative.
2007-08-28 11:29:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by davidifyouknowme 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lions have eaten gazelles for millions of years; shouldn't it be the gazelles turn to eat lions?
Seriously kid, which biology class taught you that life works on the turns principal?
I do realize that Darwin was male, but please, take the time to understand his theory.
This planet has never been paradise.
The world is not the way it is because men rule it.
Men are the way they are because that's what it takes to rule the world.
For every meal you've had, something had to die.
Death makes life. Life makes death.
Women make life, Men make death.
Making life is all about nurturing.
Making death is all about the projection of violence.
The purpose of women is to bear and raise children
The purpose of men is to acquire enough resources for women to do this.
Life is NOT a competition between men and women. It is the cooperation of men and women to raise children.
So for women to 'rule' they would have to become death makers. If everybody is making death, nobody is making life and the species dies.
The species would only survive then if men in turn became life makers.
Feminine Power would not mean the end of war, it would only change but the genitalia of the fighters.
2007-08-28 07:43:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Phoenix Quill 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Heh, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. Therein lies an elitist mentality, "Women are better than men." Real feminists fought for the 'equality of men and women.' If you had the helm, the world would be no better off. Tell me your platform. What ideas do you have which makes you the ideal candidate to change the whole world? What do you know about the economy, science and technology, ecology--hardly anything, I would suspect. So why would you think that you, or your peers are right to control the whole world and dominate men--whom I might add, are generally dominant in personality, and would make a war of it.
2007-08-28 06:01:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
2⤋
Sure, it's about time we gave women a chance to show just how much better a job they could do of wrecking the world. Fair's fair!
My lack of faith is not in gender, but humanity as a whole!
2007-08-28 06:02:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by SDW 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Try telling the top 16 richest people in the world (all men)
2007-08-28 09:48:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
you do realise women are (not all) cause more fights than they prevent women are no better than men and in some cases worse. women also tend to be the biggest bullies in the work place and look at thatcher more of her is whats needed.
2007-08-28 10:18:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by manapaformetta 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If only that were true. People might disagree with me but I'm sure Maggie Thatcher was a woman. Did she improve things?
2007-08-28 06:08:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
you want your own turn in messing up the planet?
help yourself
what would you do differently?
2007-08-28 08:28:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by numbnuts222 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually no. I don't know about you but I've worked with women only at me last job and too much
estrogen = cattiness, bossyness, jealously, gossip and chaos. I think women are crazier then men
2007-08-28 06:40:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kate 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
why would you do such a good job. my wife cannot even decide what clothes she will wear from one day to the next. also how are you gonna rise up because if we were serious we would kick you all over the place.
2007-08-28 07:13:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋