The perfect example of Christianity never commanded His followers to wage war against unbelievers.
The perfect example of Islam commanded his followers to wage war against Jews, Christians, and pagans. He even went on to say that these others should be attacked and killed.
Jesus never killed anyone. Muhammed killed many.
Which religion is the religion of Peace?
Qu'ran approves of terrorism
sura 2:193 Fight the infidels until they accept Islam.
sura 2:191 Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them
sura 9:123 Make war on the infidels living in your neighbourhood.
sura 9:5 When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.
sura 9:29 Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert toIslam or refuse to pay Jizya tax.
sura 3:85 Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.
sura 9:30 The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.
sura 5:33 Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam.
sura 9:28 The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.
sura 9:73 Be harsh with the unbelievers.
sura 22:19 Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.
sura 25:52 Fight the unbelievers vigorously without any exception.
sura 47:4 Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them.
sura 8:65 The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.
sura 3:28 Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.
sura 8:12 Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.
sura 8:60 Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels.
2007-08-27 14:08:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anthony M 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver
tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou
shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve
them from this generation for ever. (Psalm 12:6-7)
If God kept His promise, then what we need to do is simple. Have archaeologists find all the copies and pieces of copies they can find that have survived from ancient times. If God kept his promise, copying errors will not have polluted the text. Instead, when we compare the copies from churches all over the ancient world, we will find that they agree, that they all had basically the same text. If we occasionally find a copy that does not match the others, we will throw it out, knowing that it was made by a sloppy copyist.
This has, in fact been done. The Old Testament Hebrew text was preserved by the Levites. The apostles quoted it, and we can trust it. For the New Testament, of all the copies in existence today, 95% agree in an incredible way. God did keep His promise! Only 5%, a tiny minority, are "messed up." All we have to do is put together a Hebrew and Greek text made up from our overwhelming majority of ancient texts, and we will have a text that we can be confident is exactly the same as the one held by the early church. Today, this text is called by several names, the most common being the "Received Text" or "Textus Receptus."
This was the text used by devout translators like William Tyndale, Martin Luther, John Calvin and others, some of whom died to preserve the Scriptures. If they were going to have to die for it, they were determined to die for the right text! This is also the text used to make the most famous and durable of all English Bibles, the King James Bible.
No modern English Bible translation uses this text! But that's another story.
True, there are many different versions of the Bible. There are versions in Chinese for the Chinese. There are versions in Russian for the Russian people. There are actually thousands of versions of the Bible—some in foreign languages, and some are in old English. Few, in the printing age, can claim that they don’t have access to the Scriptures in their own language. However, each translation is based on the original biblical texts. See Psalm 119:105.
2007-08-27 22:07:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Evolution - of - the - gaps 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
...and where exactly did Muhammad "discover" the Quran? He didn't "discover" it, he wrote it. You say the Bible has changed. Wrong! It has been revised, not to reflect changes, but to update the language so as to allow better understanding. Not unlike when the Quran has been written in other languages. You say that the Bible "used to say" no eating of swine "pork. Whoever told you that was making stuff up. Look at Lev. 11:7-8. It still says it. You would do well to concentrate on your Prophet Jesus, but like the Jews, you too dismiss Him.
2007-08-27 21:21:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
In the Old testament of the Bible, eating pork is not allowed, but in the New testament after Jesus Christ, it is okay to eat. The bible has not changed it has only been translated from one language to another, and rememeber the bible was here long before the "Quran". The Quran took many things from the bible and changed it! so the Quran is the fake book here, and here have a look here, http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Top-10-Reasons.htm
Islam is a false religion the Quran is corrupt, Jesus warned us about fake prophets like Muhammed, but it's not your fault you have been brainwashed and i will pray for you.
2014-03-21 17:11:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You see there is a little problem. I don't read Hebrew and Greek, so I can't very well read the original text of the Bible because I can't read those languages. However, our pastors do study Greek and Hebrew and can read the original texts. Those texts do exist. Instead I read a translation in English. If you can read the original text of the Quran, more power to you. Have fun with that. If you think that makes a difference. OK, go with it. However, I think you're just making a mountain out of a mole hill.
By the way, do think you're earning some kind of points with this line of reasoning?
2007-08-27 21:09:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by William D 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
First these newer versions you talk about are not new words just an update on the language. As language progress words fall out of use and repalced by others therefore the need to update. Secondly the not even eting of pork is in there. Yet in the testement written after messiah came these were done away with by God for the inclusion of Gentiles and better higiene and cooking came along. by the way i'm Christian.
2007-08-27 21:07:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by s. grant 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
I believe the pork bit is still there, although I can't see where the Quran has any advantage over the Bible. Maybe they took out one of the references to pork; I'm not sure about that.
2007-08-27 21:10:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
the Bible has not changed...and it is still wrong to eat pork...there are so many atheists and money making food corporations that ignore the word of God and the common sense of it...pig is unclean and do not eat it..... and the grocery stores are full of that garbage.....
they get sick and blame God while they are eating pig /garbage
the new testament did not change the dietary laws.....read your Bible a little closer....the clean and unclean was in reference to the Jews/ clean and the Gentiles / unclean and both being allowed access to the word of God...
don't place the wrong doing on God when man is the one doing the wrong....
2007-08-27 21:09:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by coffee_pot12 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
they'll say that the old rules are not for them, they're too good for it. LOL. Basically they just keep the Bible there for sh*ts and giggles, they don't take it seriously or follow it's laws.
2007-08-28 00:31:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by B 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
WHY DON'T YOU EXPLAIN! The admnition had to do with animals with a CLOVEN HOOF! it was unclean FOR THEM! but all you guys see is th' PIG! I got one for YOU,---muslim, tell me why Jebreel,Jibril or whom ever it was who came to your prophet SQUEEZE im, even more than once? Wait a minute let's get back to wut ya said, MY answer to you it OUR ENGLISH CHANGES!--OR ARE YOU HEARING ENGLISH 'SPAKE TO THOU AS THOU GOEST??? so ya don't know the original HEBREW or GREEK? You probabily can't read your Quran! Explain whst I asked you IF YOU CAN! Here is another Gabriel said to Mariam, rejoice highly favored one, to Zacharias, I AM GABRIEL WHO STANDS IN THE PRESENCEOF GOD----He told him not to be afraid, WHY WEREN'T THEY 'EMBRACED' HUH? Tell me of ANY of God's prophets besiesd Muhammed whogot the SQUEEZE? Ya now what? the Jew's don't heve a newer VERSION either YOU EXPLAIN SOMETHINGS IF YOU CAN WHICH I DOUBT! Why couldn't Muhammed HEAL the sick? the blind? or raise the dead? He couldn't even do what MOSES did! Oh yeah when did the HEBREW change? Geez th' greek looks as it did 2,000 yr's ago. Jibril wuz a LIAR when he told Muhammed that Judas was subtituted for Yeshua! ABOVE ALL YOU SAY ISLAM PERFECTS THE PROPHISIES, MUHAMMED IS THE LAST OF THE PROPHETS! Then he and jibreel contradicts the word of God as if God can't preserve his WORD! explainhow ALLAH & YHWH are the same God when God told Moses his PERSONAL name and said to Moses "this is MY NAME FOREVER, and this is My memorial to ALL generations". Well EXPLAIN! Y'know ya can't explian t' YOU? why explain to someone who can't answer when they are questioned? My freind Ali said to me after discussing, debating, and even arguing,,,,MAN I'M GOING TO KILL YOU! wereas I tild hih SO Jesus said 'I WILL RAISE HIM UP AT THE LAST DAY. last question why are you guys so carnal? Did God have sex with the earth when He created Adam? Did ya READ the genealogy of Jesus? well it ends with 'which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God! Or the Angels which aer called Sons of God!also morning starsHE ALSO TOLD MOSES TO SAY TO PHARAOH, "ISRAEL IS MY SON MY FIRST BORN. and you dummies can't get ya mind off carnal knoweledge! you explain if you can! But I forgot this, is where your 'stuff breaks down BYE!
2007-08-27 22:31:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by hamoh10 5
·
0⤊
1⤋