when doctors look at serial killers they seem to have the need to be mean to animals or to touchier and kill them ,sounds to me he fits that and the only reason people like him say they are sorry is they got caught,it might be if you found six to eight dead dogs in anyone's back yard you might come to that conclusion.
2007-08-27 07:04:49 · 7 answers · asked by sehoy 1 in Health ➔ Mental Health
No, a lot of people bury their pets in the backyard. Owning a rape cage, breadstick, & 50+ battered and torn pit bulls is what's wrong. Ofcourse we know those pit bulls that were buried weren't pets.
I agree he wasn't sorry for what he done, he's sorry he got caught.
I don't think he's serial killer type, he's a lying dog killing coward that doesn't care for animals type.
2007-08-27 07:19:28 · answer #1 · answered by blessed1 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I heard his "sorry ***" aplogy on the news. You'd think all he did was forget to give his dogs water for a day. That guy not only fought dogs to the death, but actually had some electracuted! Sounds like the dude's gonna do prison time and lose over 100 million bucks! I don't think any sane person could find sympathy. I don't know if he could be the serial killer type with humans, but he has no respect for God's other creatures. And no remorse!
2007-08-27 14:20:07 · answer #2 · answered by zen 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Eat your pig, eat your chicken, eat your fish, eat your cow, eat your cat, eat your dog...yum, yum, yum.
I for one love barbecued dog. If you have never eaten barbecued Labradors, you are missing out. I had to go to Taiwan for that.
I think that Michael Vic's dogs should be roasted or barbecued and they should hold a big party. By the way, what is wrong with what Michael Vick did? It seems extremely hypocritical to charge him but let everyone in our food industry go free.
His dogs were treated no worse than the gazillion animals in America that are grown for food. What's the difference? And don't tell me that the difference is that his actions were illegal while the actions of the food industry are legal. We all know that. The question is an ethical one, not a legal one.
2007-08-29 00:34:08 · answer #3 · answered by http://www.wrightlawnv.com 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
A fit punishment for this monster would be a hefty dose of his own medicine.
2007-08-27 14:24:23 · answer #4 · answered by michele 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
naw...some ppl really don't care about anI'mals im pretty sure he would not do that to a human...i guess he says hey...its a dog...he wont get in trouble besides if a dog gets kill no one would care..i think hes pretty stupid tho....he have all that money and hes still not satisfied....o:well
2007-08-27 14:11:18 · answer #5 · answered by crazeyashell3 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think he is only sociologically, but I could be wrong
2007-08-27 17:02:09 · answer #6 · answered by Blah Blah Blah 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yep, hes a sick son of a
2007-08-29 01:45:34 · answer #7 · answered by ladyinleppard 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋