I always try to clarify my own personal stance by saying that philosophically I'm an agnostic, because I admit I don't "know" anything for certain, and I'm all too aware of that handicap.
But morally, I'm an atheist. I reject the argument that just because we can't decide the "God" question once and for all, we all might as well believe. I say we all might as well NOT believe. After all, we can't conclusively say whether leprechauns actually exist either. Why? Because we haven't found any! You see how crowded with imaginary beings the universe would become if we allowed this sort of argument?
2007-08-27 06:16:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
My parents made me. You can believe what you want.
There is no evidence of god(s). There is nothing that would make me believe. I was not indoctrinated very well as a child. I'm not desperate to believe. I'm ok without.
You do whatever works for you. I've studied religion, and I became Pagan. But not theistic, since I still don't have any contact with a higher power.
2007-08-27 06:16:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont believe in the christian god, because growing up as a christian, never once did i experience anything that showed me that he existed. I experienced hatred, and malice, condemnation, damnation, i experienced all the negative sides that would lead me to believe that he doesnt exist however, because if he did, why would he be allowing things to happen the way they did. I prayed, i read the bible, i asked for his help, forgiveness, salvation, blah blah F'ing blah, but nothing was all i ever recieved. His absense is as much of proof as i needed. I dont know if i believe in a higher power, sure there are things i cant explain, but at this point, im to angry to consider other alternatives. There might very well be some from of higher power, but the christian view is not it, and i hope all christians die a lonely pitiful miserable death and know that their god has abandoned them, because he was never there to begin with, and all the time they wasted, hurting other people instead of loving people, and praying for forgivness instead of taking action and taking responsibility for their lives was wasted, they wasted away their lives, the one and only chance we get.
2007-08-27 06:25:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's not an "or" question.
More to the point: I'm not responsible for backing up my lack of belief, because non-belief isn't a positive claim. Belief, however, IS a positive claim, and it is positive claims which must be backed with evidence. The fact that you exist doesn't prove anything by itself. You believe that your existence is proof of a deity because you already believe in a deity - your evidence thus assumes the conclusion it is offered to prove. This is an example of a logical fallacy called "begging the question," and is an example of lazy thought.
2007-08-27 06:19:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
'Blind Faith' is redundant because Faith IS blind. Faith is believing in something simply because someone or something tells you to. It does not require evidence, data, looking at the world, investigation, experiment, testing or any thing else other than just listening to what someone says and believing it, period. That is blindness. Therefore all faith is blind.
2007-08-27 06:19:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hahaha, Great reasoning you have there, I believe in god because I am incapable of figuring out how I came here.
Well your mom and dad had something to do with it, but that might be a bit technical for you.
I am an Atheist because that is how ALL humans are born. It only as we grow and some of us lose a grip on reality that they choose to believe fairy tales.
2007-08-27 06:35:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
so you want atheists to prove that something which has no evidence to prove it does exist (ie diety ofyour choice) doesn't exist
I say there are invisible blue fairies living at the bottom of my garden. If you don't prove they don't exist then you're taking it on blind faith that they don't
2007-08-27 07:39:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
many times definite - whether some have confident themselves that god talks to them, or look to make certain the stunning issues interior the international as data of god (at an analogous time as thoroughly ignoring the terrible issues) - that's quite self fable. Please do no longer type the beginning up of each be conscious in capitals. it incredibly is unnecessarily strange.
2016-10-17 02:58:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by coiscou 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Um, no.
No faith is not blind faith. How does that even make sense to you?
2007-08-27 06:14:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by ~Heathen Princess~ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree, everyone should think for themselves and be very, very clear on why they believe what they believe.
2007-08-27 06:21:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by KC 7
·
1⤊
0⤋