Ok, this is a remake of an abortion question from a little while ago. This time about something else.
Ok, there is a burning building or its about to collapse or whatever. On one side of the building is your child (lets say you only have one or only one of your children are in the building). On the other side, there is a room with 3 children from stranger's families. You only have time to rescue one (lets say no one but you is at the scene).
Do you save your one child or save 3 childen from strangers?
Me: I would not even hesitate or feel guilty about it, my kids first, absolutely.
2007-08-26 17:32:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I would save my own child, without question, and then attempt to save the others at risk of my own life.
2007-08-26 17:39:31 · answer #1 · answered by wondermus 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Mine, of course. Mine is my responsibility, my love, and it's my job to put him first.
I may cry for the other kids but I MUST save mine.
2007-08-27 00:44:23 · answer #2 · answered by KC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As a parent, my responsiblilty is to my child first. They are your first stewardship.
2007-08-27 03:39:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you got something to offer with even a basic intellectual value..?
2007-08-27 00:44:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
my kid. i would feel really bad about not being able to rescue the other's children, but it's my kid first.
2007-08-27 00:38:25 · answer #5 · answered by . 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Those other parents should have been watching their own kids.
2007-08-27 00:39:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
hypothetical questions are useless
2007-08-27 00:38:24 · answer #7 · answered by Jack 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋