English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-26 10:29:36 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

15 answers

Absolutely!

2007-08-26 10:43:19 · answer #1 · answered by D 2 · 2 4

Apparently you know very little about our Government, or your just repeating things you hear others say. Bush, AND THE CONGRESS AND THE SENATE went to war. If for one moment the left wing radical liberals thought they could impeach Mr Bush they would. The left wing liberals will do anything to win an election. Instead of asking that question, you should try and understand why we are doing what we are doing with the War in Iraq and Afghanistan. Please study some history starting with radical Islamics since 1975, after you understand that, link it to the Great Crusades of the 13th and 14th century's.........you'll start to understand what is going on.

2007-08-26 10:44:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Only if Bill Clinton is prosecuted as a serial rapist and if Hillary Clinton prosecuted for impersonating a human being.

2007-08-26 10:56:31 · answer #3 · answered by Dee B 4 · 3 2

President Bush HAS NOT Committed any war crimes, then the US Congress would have to be tried for war crimes!!!

2007-08-26 11:42:57 · answer #4 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1 1

i'm distinctly lots as anti-conflict as you will get, and with the possibility might continuously vote for a frontrunner who might thoroughly replace the character of our effect indoors the middle East, ie a concentration on democratically targeted political help as opposed to self-pushed monetary imperialism. in spite of the actuality that, i don't think of of you will possibly be able to advise Obama is a conflict offender to a similar quantity as Bush. he's already managing criticisms and stress from the suited for his functional and needed on the brink of centre guidelines; to get rid of troops from Afghanistan and so forth might in actuality perpetuate this. jointly as i think of he shouldn't proceed with u . s . of usa's 'unlawful' wars, I additionally think of of it rather is arbitrary to describe him in words equivalent to those used jointly as pertaining to Bush.

2016-12-31 06:03:39 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Your question just proves how dumb liberals really are and how Bush has been spanking you guys for the last 7 years...

Regardless, liberals hate national security, President Bush and the military...

2007-08-26 11:10:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

i wish Michael Vick would unleash some of his meanest, most psycho, most rabid pit bulls upon Dubya. that would rockkkkkkkkkk!!!!!

2007-08-26 11:30:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

This is getting boring. Try something new and original. Oh, you;re brain dead. i guess
that's Bush's fault.

2007-08-26 11:23:48 · answer #8 · answered by Barry auh2o 7 · 2 3

Absolutely! Why hasn't Pelosi started impeachment immediately?

2007-08-26 10:36:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 5

Is this a question or a statement?

2007-08-26 12:04:07 · answer #10 · answered by erehwon 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers