refrigeration compressors couldn't be used anyway.
they have no spark plugs- required for ignition.
or ignition timing device
the exhaust valves could not handle the heat of combustion, and would melt/warp fairly quickly.
no oil filtering provisions.
possibly an issue with oil viscosity and pump/bearing clearence.
you could not use refrigeration oil any
longer because it isn't designed for use in an internal combustion application.
finally, you can't cool the compressor. it doesn't have water jackets cast or fins to radiate excess heat.
refrigerant cools the motor windings in normal operation, there is no provision for that either.
2007-08-26 03:44:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by afratta437 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only economically feasible way would be to produce the electricity you need for the electrolysis of water from something like solar or wind energy. Obtaining the electricity from coal, oil, etc. makes no sense ... you would better off burning the fossil fuels directly instead of first creating hydrogen.
This is actually an interesting idea because one of the major drawbacks of wind and solar is that they're not available all the time. So, if you used them to produce hydrogen, you could at least store the hydrogen and use it at night or when the wind isn't blowing.
Now, before you jump on this as the world's energy saving solution, keep in mind that you would need VAST solar cell or wind farms to make this practical. In other words, it works in theory, but would cost a lot of money to make it practical. I've actually helped build 2 prototypes, but they're very small.
There has also been recent discussion of producing hydrogen using nuclear power, and this is considered to be much more efficient than electrolysis. But, the public (so far) is dead set against the expansion of nuclear power plants.
2007-08-26 09:29:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by jdkilp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The power required to separate hydrogen from water will exceed the power output from the generator. If you already have the power in the first place there is no need to convert it to hydrogen except for cases were you can't connect a wire or need a huge amount of power all at once ( launch the space shuttle, for example).
A much more practical scheme, where you have lots of sunshine, would be something solar based. Solar cells for small power uses such as radios, phones, and computers. For larger applications, use the sun to power a Stirling engine that can drive a generator.
2007-08-26 01:14:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Thinker 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The only economic approach to using hydrogen to fuel power generation is to react water with hydrocarbons. This process frees hydrogen from both the hydrocarbon and water. The biproduct of this process is carbon dioxide, which can be collected and sequestered, preventing its emission into the atmosphere. Energy is required to do this, but this can be provided by burning some of the hydrogen produced, or by burning some of the carbon containing feed stock. There are several commercial scale projects currently in development that use this approach.
2007-08-26 07:36:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no economical way available today. Industry uses millions of tons of Hydrogen a year for many processes. If it could be produced cheaper, they would.
It is a good idea, but not practicle.
The best option for isolated areas is a solar system. It is still expensive power compared to grid power, but does work.
2007-08-26 01:48:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by GABY 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The main reason people aren't building gigantic plants to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen is because it takes more energy to obtain the hydrogen than the hydrogen releases when combusted. Unless you can't plug the appliance in, hydrogen is out of the question, unless technology finds a way to quick, eco-friendly, cheap hydrogen.
2007-08-28 14:18:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you remember the man in Columbus, Ohio who was poisoned by 2 Arabic men because he discovered a way to separate Hydrogen from water and power his car, but when offered $750,000 to stop doing his research he refused? Well if you don't, learn from his death. Our world runs on oil. Trying to power anything more conveniently will only get you into trouble. The oil companies have taken over, and will not step down for a man who wants to make the world a better place. Just be careful what you're messing with....
2007-08-25 22:04:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
6⤋