English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No musim Country allowed other religions to rule. India gave 3 Muslim Presidents to us. Kashmir, Mumbai, Ahmadabad, Surat and in Hyderabad and all parts are facing terror from Muslim Terrorists. May be all Muslims are not terrorists but all terrorists are Muslims. Is India acting submissively?

2007-08-25 16:21:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

Becoz you are either not able to analyse the situation or just pretending to be an ignorant.

One example will perhaps satisfy you.

You say that Gujrat riots would not have happened had there been no GODHARA incidence. [During Gujrat riots thosands of innocent Muslims were butceherd by Modi regime].

Right ?

We say Bombay blasts would not have taken lives of innocent people had there been no riots after the demolition of Babri Mosque.[ where again thosands of Musl;ims were were killed.]

Now see the mockery of justice.

All involved in Bombay blats were sentenced to death and other vigorous punishment while............

on the other hand the culprits who left no option for the victimised muslims but to retaliate [ of course in an unlawful manner] ..........

ARE RUNNING FREE with even no guilt on their conscience.


Therefore it is the feeling in even moderate Muslims that they have been cheated and that they are not going to get any justice from you.


Remember me for 200 years if you could produce a MUSLIM PRIME MINISTER, EVER IN INDIA.

Dear buddy it's your line of thinking which is forcing Muslims to become terrorists.

You are the MOTHER OF ALL TERRORISM.........



Anyway leave aside this and accept my complements for the beautiful festival of love "RAKSHABANDHAN".


|||||||||||||||||| N ||||||||||||||||||| N ||||||||||||||||||||| N ||||||||||||||||||||||| N ||||||||||||||||||||||||||

2007-08-25 17:27:30 · answer #1 · answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6 · 0 1

No first act of violence has ever been initiated by your alleged ' Bajrang Dal " or " VHP " any where in the country. What you see at a later stage is the reaction or retaliation of the violent act by any specific community against Hindus. Had there been no Hindu organisations existed, the majority Hindus would have miserably come down to near minority by ill forces. Fact remains, the problem does not remain there. It is the sorry state of affair with the rulling PSUDO-SECULARISTS of the Indian soil, that, after every act of terrorism by a handful group of people belonging to minority community ( may be Muslim or Christian ) the said so-called secularists immediately come to the rescue of the perpatrators of crime and start playing dirty politics over the issue. They grossly neglect the affected persons of Hindu Majority community, thereby add fuel of hatred and retaliation / reaction . The rulers have in no occasion tried to pacify the situation by taking instant action against the perpatrators of the initial crime. Rather they carry the situation longer, to gain their political ill benefit from the issue. The above situation can be tasted by closely examining each and every such past violence anywhere inside the nation. Thanks.

2016-05-18 00:00:33 · answer #2 · answered by phyliss 3 · 0 0

Who said that Muslims are the Terrorists only The dirty american and the president of America the George.W.Bush only says that for the sake of controlling the OIL. So that they can control the world. Muslims are like our brothers and sisters only. U can say that in terrorist activities lot of Muslim is there. Even the Osama-Bin-Laden was created only the by the America to destroy the Russia during the Cold war period. The Americans use the Muslims illeteracy to do all act of terrorism.

2007-08-25 18:46:34 · answer #3 · answered by Ramasubramanian 6 · 2 1

Its wrong to blame Muslims in the name of terrorism. Actually
the lack of education and the wrong way of education leads
a man to terrorism. In these conditions some private groups are taking advantage from this and it leads to terrorism

2007-08-29 09:41:40 · answer #4 · answered by cecil 1 · 0 0

The day when Babri Masjid was broken, the seed for terrorism had been sown. Our great leaders whom we call visionary have brought this impasse to this country for their mean political gains.

Edit
And we are targtting a community backs to the wall. If and only if, wise Hindus, who love this country, raise their voice against the attitudinal problem that we are having against the minorities, our problems of terrorism will be addressed.

2007-08-26 07:50:47 · answer #5 · answered by Vijay D 7 · 1 1

Muslims were rulers of India and in that capacity allowed other religions to flourish. India was partitioned by the British in 1947 while hundreds of years back India was under the Muslim rule with religious freedom as ordained in Islam. Muslims are not terrorists as terror is not permitted by Islam. But tell me whosoever fights for his rights usurped by tyrants in violations of fundamental rights you may call him according to your mentality but that person concerned remains a freedom fighter. The media is highlighting crimes in the society by Muslims as acts of terrorism but do you suppose all others in segment of the society are all sacred cows. The crime statistics of India and America tell a different story than their proclaimed stance. The word terrorist is coined by President Bush and the American media that supports him as synonymous with Muslims but has he any concrete evidence of their terrorist acts? What President Bush is doing in Iraq, Afghanistan and other Muslim countries are flagrant dastardly acts of the great terrorist President Bush but no one has the courage to him that in his face. All propaganda of Weapons of Mass Destruction is the greatest lie President Bush told his simple believing American people. And actually no Muslim was involved in 9/11 also but President Bush had to make for his incompetence and the incompetence of his FIB by attributing this to Muslims apparently in an vain effort to show he acted promptly. Crime doers dont respect any religion and therefore any allusion to it is absurd.

2007-08-25 16:45:29 · answer #6 · answered by bashah1939 4 · 1 3

Again I smell a rat. Someone pretending to be a Hindu. Old trick. Fools no one.

2007-08-27 09:21:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

"all terrorists are muslims" ? oh, really? Do you think we'd better tell the IRA or ETA that they aren't actually Catholics after all?

2007-08-25 16:27:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

If sweet milk is fed to a snake, will he stop spitting venom? Never.
That is his characteristic after all.

2007-08-25 18:09:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

because all Muslims are not the same type

2007-08-25 19:12:42 · answer #10 · answered by Rana 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers